Laura Ingraham, the popular primetime host on Fox News, took the discussion about Vice President Kamala Harris into uncharted territory on a recent Friday, banishing her to the status of ‘hugger-in-chief.’ It seems Harris cannot catch a break from the sharp-edged observations on Fox, where the unorthodox style of the vice president has been fair game. Earlier, the Fox pundits raised doubts about whether Harris, who’s known for her surprising laugh, was even in the right senses while on duty. The critique reached a new high in the premiere of The Ingraham Angle, which unflinchingly painted the vice president as unfit for the nation’s highest office.
Instead of presenting her as a viable presidential hopeful, Ingraham suggested Harris would be more suited playing a very different role – something akin to running a sorority home. Reinforcing her argument, Ingraham shared a moment when Harris stumbled before Russia’s shocking invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Harris, demonstrating a clearly unrehearsed approach, acknowledged to reporters, ‘I mean, listen guys: We’re talking about the potential for war in Europe. I mean, let’s really take a moment to understand the significance of what we’re talking about.’
Ingraham could not help but voice her disappointment at Harris’s lack of political finesse in dealing with such a grave international scenario. She saw this as a strong indicator that Harris might be better suited to more congenial pursuits. ‘Oh, yeah. That was a bad one,’ Ingraham remarked, suggesting it would be better for Harris to stick to her apparent forte as the ‘hugger-in-chief.’
Embracing this new moniker for Harris, the Fox host proceeded to share a spate of instances where Harris seemed to focus more on hugging people at public events than on any substantial political maneuvers. Harris, it seems, concentrated her time on stage at three different events in handling the task of embracing individuals publicly.
During an Atlanta rally on a Tuesday, Harris found herself embracing Tyler Greene, a recent Morehouse College graduate. The sorority leader Rasheeda S. Liberty found herself in the comforting arms of Harris at Sigma Gamma Rho’s convention in Houston the following day. However, perhaps the most surprising display of Harris’s hugging prowess came the next day when she decided to publicly hug none other than Bill and Hillary Clinton at the eulogy for the well-known Democratic lawmaker, Representative Sheila Jackson Lee.
Could this continual embracing be little more than a tactful endeavor to disorient and distract the public? After all, it comes at an interesting time, as the Republican presidential candidates try to shake off somewhat peculiar labels given to them by Democrats. Both Donald Trump and J.D. Vance vehemently deny being ‘weird’, as labelled by the Democrats, with Trump asserting it is the Democrats, like the hugging Harris, who are ‘the weird ones.’
Laura Ingraham’s dismantling of Harris’s image casts a penetrating light on the vice president’s often puzzling behavior. Where other media outlets might tiptoe around such topics, Ingraham’s forthright critiques on Fox News offer an alternative view that challenges the mainstream narrative.
Ingraham’s view suggests that a vice president’s primary role is to bring a firm hand to the political discourse, not to engage in sentimental displays. Harris’s responses to contentious global issues seem perfunctory at best, exposing her inexperience and a rather shallow understanding of diplomatic matters.
Harris’s behavior in public spaces, as characterized by Ingraham, paints a picture of a vice president more interested in soft diplomacy – hugging, to be more specific – than in addressing real, tangible issues. By contrasting these actions with the dismissive term ‘hugger-in-chief,’ Ingraham highlights what she perceives as Harris’s illusory role in governance.
Harris’s public show of camaraderie might serve as a balm for those wishing for a kinder political world, but it does little for the citizens seeking concrete actions from their public servants. In that regard, Ingraham’s commentary provides an unequivocal reality-check on the functions that a vice president ought to fulfill.
Under this address of ‘hugger-in-chief,’ Ingraham poses an alternative perspective of Harris: a vice president whose major claim to fame are her regular hugging sprees rather than decisive leadership. It’s a perspective that perhaps mocks the agenda of the Democrats, aiming to satirize their approach to high office.
Both Donald Trump and J.D. Vance have found themselves on the receiving end of labels from Democrats, with accusations of being ‘weird.’ Ingraham’s examination of ‘hugger-in-chief’ Harris could well serve as a pointed rebuttal to these claims, conveying the suggestion that when it comes to unconventional behavior, the Democrats might want to take a closer look within their own ranks.
Interesting also is the timing of Ingraham’s critique, coinciding with the Republicans’ struggle to dodge labels. From this viewpoint, Ingraham is perhaps mocking Harris’s incessant hugging while subverting these labels, implying that what’s dubbed as ‘weird’ is the Democrats themselves and their atypical approaches to governance.
As Ingraham emphasizes, the vice president’s role requires political intelligence and sound reasoning, not the ability to ensnare people in habitual embraces. Harris, by her actions, seems to be presenting an antithesis of what that role should entail, becoming the centerpiece of political satire.
Whether this critique will inspire a palpable shift in the public perception of Harris remains to be seen. However, it is clear that Ingraham’s biting commentary has thrust a new perspective into the national conversation, one that is unlikely to be ignored in the coming days.
It paints a telling picture: an unconventional vice president, more invested in spreading warmth than providing substantial leadership. If anything, this scenario confirms the necessity for a more serious, action-oriented approach from the vice president, a role traditionally reserved for important decision-making. Suddenly, the Democrats’ accusation of ‘weirdness’ looks less like a critique and more like projection.
Ingraham Exposes Kamala the ‘Hugger-in-Chief’: Political Ineptitude Highlighted appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
