Many find the evolution of Donald Trump’s oratory skills to be a testament of his ability to adapt and resonate with his audience over time. Critics have attempted to claim that his seemingly more casual and straightforward speaking style pinpoints a cognitive decline, but their assertions appear unfounded and simplistically biased.
Those who have watched Trump, the dynamic former President, since 2017, should know that his speeches have evolved in a way that emphasizes clarity and connection with his audience. Some detractors may describe this shift as a decrease in verbal complexity, but others may see this shift as a savvy political strategy to communicate major issues more efficiently.
Ben Michaelis, a clinical psychologist, mentions changes such as using shorter sentences, verbal repetitions, and changes in word order. These might actually be viewed as the essence of oratory prowess – the ability to convey complex concepts in simple terms to reach a wider audience. Such a shift could also be a sign of maturity and a middle ground approach to ensure that everyone understands his messages clearly.
Michaelis minimizes instances when Trump interchangeably uses names, accepting that this could happen to anyone. Supportively, he acknowledges that the former President’s speeches have shown an increase in digressions since 2017. Many view such rhetorical strategy as an engaging conversational technique rather than a point of concern.
A segment of critics unreasonably suggests the possibility of dementia, citing Trump’s simplified speeches as proof. Given the lack of medical evidence to support the claim, such a stance appears to be influenced by personal biases rather than being rooted in professional judgment.
Terms like ‘extended digressions’ or phrases used out of order, are often seen in Trump’s speeches. His supporters, however, find such occurrences refreshing, setting him apart from the run-of-the-mill politicians and underlining his natural charisma and authenticity.
Experts like Andrew Budson, a neurology professor, believe that Trump’s off-script moments tie back to the frontal lobe, which is most affected by aging. Such a theory seems to conveniently overlook the fact that people of all ages can exhibit non-linear conversations, and it’s not necessarily tied to aging or any medical condition.
James Pennebaker, a social psychologist, has detected the rise of an ‘all-or-nothing-thinking’ in Trump’s communication. The critics interpret this as a sign of cognitive decline, but is it not possible that Trump’s approach of laying out clear choices could be a strategic decision geared towards eliciting a strong response from his listeners?
Throughout his political journey, Trump has increasingly brought up the past during his speeches. This habit can be seen as an effective rhetorical tool to remind his audiences about how far America has come under his leadership and the importance of not losing sight of the achievements made.
Pennebaker even analyzed Trump’s speeches’ score in a linguistic metric of analytical thinking, which he claims is unusually low. This seems to suggest that Trump uses simple words and sentences, a speaking style that has, in fact, endeared him to a broad audience who appreciate his direct, unpretentious communication style.
It is interesting to note that summit-level politicians usually score in the linguistic range of 60-70. While Trump’s are less, viewing this as a disadvantage is a subjective perspective. In an era dominated by convoluted political rhetoric, Trump’s down-to-earth style could actually be seen as a breath of fresh air.
Despite Pennebaker’s claims about the staggering simplicity of Trump’s speeches, many question the negative inferences. A critical view of such findings suggests that they reflect more about the prejudices of the critics than about the former President’s cognitive abilities.
Trump’s successful career as a businessman and politician suggest an ability to think and speak in the most effective way to achieve his goals. His communication style reflects a strong grasp of strategic self-presentation rather than a sign of cognitive decline. To suggest otherwise, as some critics have, belies an overtly partisan perspective rather than a nonbiased evaluation.
Trump’s Oratory Prowess: A Testament to His Ingenuity appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
