Lara Trump, esteemed co-chair of the RNC, recently put forth a robust critique of Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump, who commendably maintains a keen eye on the developments within the American political landscape, questioned the merit-based nature of Harris’s career rise. With keen insight and audacity, Trump astutely criticized the political machinations that appear to privilege one’s traits over their qualifications. In a society that values meritocracy, such sharp observations are critically essential.
Trump’s commentary highlighted Harris’s ‘failed upward’ career trajectory as she noted, ‘To be honest, [Harris] has failed upward her entire career.’ Trump’s evaluation of Harris’s career progression is not without basis. It’s no secret that Harris’s rise to prominence has been marked with controversy. Despite these indiscretions, she still managed to secure the vice presidency. This scenario poses a thought-provoking question: Are qualifications being sidestepped for other considerations?
When Joe Biden selected Kamala Harris as his running mate, many questioned the rationale behind it. Trump courageously expressed their skepticism: ‘We know why—Joe Biden chose her to be vice president.’ Without mincing words, she conjectured that the selection might have been influenced by factors beyond merit, skill set, or capability. Such a practice stands in stark contrast to the principles of an egalitarian society.
Trump further emphasized that being selected for any role based on one’s gender or racial identity rather than skill or ability is grossly unfair. She firmly proclaimed, ‘Do me a favor—don’t ever give me a position based on the fact that I’m a woman. Either I earned it, or I didn’t.’ Trump’s candid statement encapsulates her staunch belief in fair competition and equal opportunities for all.
Trump’s critique of Harris also extends to the vice president’s unwelcome remarks about choosing someone not based on merit. She shared, ‘Not based on their skill set. Not based on the fact that they might be the best person for the job of vice president.’ If indeed these comments originated from Harris, they undermine the principles of a merit-based system, a belief that Trump evidently champions.
In an added display of courage, Trump directly addressed the reference to a person’s looks that was reportedly in Harris’s commentary. ‘Based on how she looks.’ – reiterating her original argument that a person’s appearance or gender must not be the basis for selection, especially in such high-ranking positions.
Trump’s cogently argued position is further solidified with her commentary: ‘Based on the fact that she’s a woman. Based on the fact that she was a minority woman.’ The meritocracy is cornerstoned by the belief that accomplishment should be earned regardless of gender or race—a powerful truth that Trump remains steadfast in supporting.
Indeed, Trump’s firm stand against the appointment of personnel based on anything other than meritocracy is refreshing. It emphasizes a much-needed return to aspirational American values, wherein talent, skill, and hard work form the basis for professional advancement, with no place for favoritism and bias.
In the wake of the appointment of the first female vice president—one who happens to identify as a woman of colour—Trump calls out the inherent bias, asserting, ‘That’s really gross as far as I’m concerned.’ She maintains her womanhood while advocating for an unbiased appraisal of qualifications, evidence of her unwavering commitment to an unbiased meritocracy.
Despite instances where her credentials were questioned, Trump maintained her integrity and stoically agreed with the meritocratic ethos. Responding to potential critiques of being considered for a position due to her marital connection, Trump diplomatically underlined her belief in meritocracy. Undeterred, she proved that individuals should be evaluated based on their qualification and competency alone.
Her illustrious career, which includes positions as a FOXNews contributor and Senior Advisor to Donald J. Trump, Inc., bears testament to her abilities, irrespective of her familial connections. The paradigm of meritocracy she follows rejects the stance that influential family ties are the sole driver of success.
Trump appropriately expressed, ‘Either I earned it or I didn’t.’ This illustrates her firm belief that achievement is attained through dedicated hard work and worthy individual qualifications—attesting to her conviction of meritocracy.
To undermine Trump’s contributions by overemphasizing her familial ties dismisses her individual merits, a reality that West Virginia GOP committeewoman Beth Bloch acknowledges. She insightfully notes that titles and experience should not be overvalued, a sentiment that bears significance given our increasingly complex and diverse society.
As Trump effectively contends the charge of her opponent, it becomes evident that the perception of meritocracy needs to be reevaluated and refreshed. Recognizing that merit doesn’t rest solely on the laurels of experience, but reaches beyond to consider individual capabilities, resilience, and the strength of character, can help ensure that every personal achievement is respectably earned.
In conclusion, Lara Trump’s clarion call for a return to meritocracy ensures that we, as a society, do not dilute the idea of earned success and accomplishment. Her views reaffirm the belief that a person’s skills and qualifications alone should determine their progress, ensuring that we uphold the core principles of American democracy.
Lara Trump’s advocacy for meritocracy within the political sphere underscores an essential shift towards fairness and transparency. Whether in public service or any other field, ensuring that accomplishments are genuinely earned is pivotal in upholding the integrity of our institutions. Therefore, her brave critique of Vice President Harris serves to reinforce the importance of maintaining a sincere and rigorous approach to merit-based appointments.
Lara Trump: Champion of Meritocracy appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
