Despite his departure from the White House, ex-President Donald Trump continues to make unfounded claims. His recent faux pas revolves around asserting that Vice President Kamala Harris’ rallies display artificially inflated crowd sizes, indicating a distressed reliance on conspiracy theories.
Just last week, Harris hosted events in Philadelphia and Eau Claire, Wisconsin, and according to her campaign, up to 12,000 individuals were present. Her team also boasted that 15,000 demonstrators showed up in Romulus, Michigan and Glendale, Arizona. Such numbers, however, unraveled as inflated bravado when cross-checked with multiple reporters on the field.
When Trump’s misaligned claims confronted reality, his team responded by posting a video on social media featuring Harris arriving with her running mate, Tim Walz, and a supposed ‘massive’ crowd cheering for them. To this spectacle, they ironically attached a comment meant for Trump himself— ‘This is what a rally in a swing state looks like.’ A weak strategy, indeed, considering the crowd’s true size shared by field reporters.
In a display of their familiar tactic—deflection, Trump’s team decided to pair the unfounded accusation against Harris’ crowd size with the former President’s perennial claim that the 2020 presidential election was ‘stolen’ from him. If skepticism had to be cast on Trump’s claims before, now they just seem parodic.
However, such behavior might make more sense in the light of Trump’s campaign’s recent happenings. Just last week, Trump rallied in Montana out of desperation due to a tight Senate race. Moreover, he also hosted a news conference at his notorious Mar-A-Lago residence in Florida.
When Trump was confronted by a reporter asking about Harris’ crowd size, he quickly deflected by making another unfounded claim. This time it was something even more outrageous. He suggested that his Jan. 6, 2021 ‘Stop the Steal’ rally managed to pull in a larger crowd than Martin Luther King Jr’s ‘I Have a Dream’ speech. It’s disappointing to see such lack of seriousness and respect in a former President.
Trump’s confidence in this claim is questionable when looking at the facts. ‘I’ve spoken to the biggest crowds. Nobody’s spoken to crowds bigger than me,’ he proclaimed. Commenting on such a ridiculous matter suggests he has his priorities skewed, not realizing the insignificance of crowd size in comparison to the more pressing national issues.
Later, when Walz and Harris were in Arizona, her campaign reported that he spoke to over 15,000 people. However, they added a mocking caveat, with Walz sarcastically stating, ‘It’s not as if anybody cares about crowd sizes or anything.’ Not an entirely inaccurate claim, it seems, given Trump’s apparent over-emphasis on crowd magnitude.
Alas, the veiled jab designed to prod at Trump’s self-perceived prowess in drawing enormous crowds couldn’t mask the reality. A pertinent question lingers: Are crowd estimates now the primary concern for those in the political sphere? Are policies and impact on common people now of secondary importance?
Rather than providing solid policies and action plans, it seems like both camps are more focused on jousting over inconsequential things. Is there not a more vital discourse to be had? It’s a shame that American politics appear to have boiled down to these negligible debates.
Demonstrably, members of both the Trump and Harris-offices seem to find glee in muddying their stances with the bizarre reasoning of their opponents. Provocation seems to be the main object of their maneuvers in the political sphere, rather than striving to serve the people they represent.
No comments have been provided by Trump’s team in response to his outlandish claims about his crowd sizes. Perhaps they’ve grown immune to such absurd utterances or maybe they prefer maintaining a deafening silence when their leader indulges in pettiness.
In an ideal democracy, the leaders should devote their energy to serving the public, developing policies, and ensuring prosperity for the nation. How unfortunate it is to witness our leaders, including Ex-President Trump and Vice President Harris, engaging in a discourse that adds little value to the nation and its people.
Harris’s campaign and ex-President Trump scoring points off each other’s dishonesty does not bode well for the state of political discourse in this country. The public needs and deserves honesty and the uptaken responsibility from their representatives.
This ongoing dispute about crowd sizes is indicative of how American politics has taken a detour from serving citizens to serve personal egos and agendas. It reflects poorly on our leaders who, instead of focusing on more pressing issues, commit to such petty quarrels.
In summary, the ongoing tit-for-tat exchanges between Trump and the Harris camp draw attention to the disheartening spectacle of American politics. The sfocus on crowd sizes is detracting from important issues that need attention, it’s utterly disappointing for those hoping for a more substantial discourse.
Harris’s Embellished Crowd Sizes: A Clear Sign of Desperation appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
