Despite claims to the contrary, the involvement of the White House in the decisions made by Federal Reserve officers is minimal, if at all. The officials assert they do not allow politics to influence their decisions on interest rates. However, given the significant influence that borrowing costs have on the nation’s economic health, any decisions made by the central bank attract substantial political attention.
As he engages with the American people, former President Donald J. Trump has been steadfast in expressing his intention to reduce interest rates should he be elected president again. Despite the lack of direct influence a president can exert on these borrowing costs, Trump has remained committed to advocating for lower interest rates.
As President, Trump constantly took to public platforms to advocate for reduced interest rates, arguing that the central bank was not acting swiftly enough. Despite the lack of concrete results from these efforts, his focus did not waver. Now out of office, his anticipation for lowered rates continues to be unabated, especially as the Federal Reserve nears its first rate cut in over four years.
Notably, Trump has never hesitated to question the political motives of the Federal Reserve. He asserts that any attempts by the institution to cut borrowing costs leading up to an election are politically charged. He firmly believes that the central bank should abstain from such actions, a sentiment he notably shared with Bloomberg Businessweek earlier this year.
His belief that those contending for the presidency should influence interest rate decisions has further fueled his critiques. On one occasion, Trump stated on Fox News that lower interest rates would, in fact, benefit Democrats. However, in a subsequent discussion, Trump retracted his earlier statement, maintaining that presidential candidates should have some influence on interest rate decisions.
Interestingly, Kamala Harris, the Democratic Vice Presidential nominee, has largely refrained from discussing the Federal Reserve and their policies. Current President, Joe Biden, has also followed a similar approach, carefully avoiding any overt attempts at dictating the actions of the Federal Reserve. Nevertheless, on occasion, he has made subtle inferences as to their potential actions.
In a notable instance, Biden suggested that he anticipated a decrease in interest rates. Such statements highlight a broader phenomenon—the party in power, currently the Democrats, usually benefits when the Federal Reserve lowers its rates. This happens because such an action sends positive economic signals, implying control over rampant inflation.
In addition to controlling inflation, lower interest rates make borrowing cheaper, thus making it easier for families to finance their dreams, be it buying a house or starting their own business. Such an economic environment significantly boosts consumer sentiment and can influence voting patterns in the upcoming election.
However, the Federal Reserve maintains that its decisions are not swayed by such considerations. Indeed, members of the Federal Reserve board are nominated by the White House and confirmed by the Senate, but upon confirmation, they operate independently and resist political pressure.
The system has been designed to provide central banks with the authority to make bold, necessary decisions. For example, keeping interest rates high to curb rampant inflation during an election year can lead to better long-term economic stability. History and global case studies have shown that political infringement can lead to issues like uncontrollable inflation.
The candidness and honesty of Trump as he addresses these issues have raised concerns among economists. They worry that Trump’s pointed commentary may pose a risk to the independence of the Federal Reserve if he is elected in the upcoming election.
Interestingly, the path to influence the Federal Reserve policies is variable and complex. For instance, Trump could aim to appoint officials who share his opinions. The leadership term for Jerome H. Powell, the current Federal Reserve chair, will end in 2026. Adriana Kugler, another Federal Reserve governor, will also have her term lapse in the same year.
Trump could also use public critique as a tool to influence Fed policy, a tactic he employed during his presidency. He once compared the performance of the Federal Reserve officials to subpar golfers, signifying disappointment in their functionality.
Lastly, some elements of the Federal Reserve’s duties, like bank regulation, could be moved closer to the White House’s direct control. Nonetheless, it seems like the power politicians currently hold over the Fed is limited. This, however, hasn’t deterred and is unlikely to deter politicians from voicing their opinions on the subject.
As we look towards future discussions around the Federal Reserve and its policies, the divergence in views suggests that these debates will continue to be an essential aspect of political discourse.
Trump’s Never-Ending Advocacy for Lower Interest Rates appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
