There seems to be a sense of bewilderment emanating from members of the red team who are not entirely submerged in the party’s prevailing ideologies. Despite all the signals, they appear blindsided by the first wave of impending elite nominations. Is there a history of alleged inappropriate behavior? Evidently, that’s not a disqualifier. An alarming deficit of relevant experience? Seems it’s not necessarily a barrier to entry. Potential conflicts of interest? Apparently, they’re more of a lure than a deterrent. With undying allegiance to the chief being the sole evident prerequisite, the expressed ‘astonishment’ and ‘displeasure’ appear to be strikingly unauthentic.
The red team has invested years in cultivating doctrines of prejudice based on race, gender, and sexuality. It has incessantly nurtured this toxic crop with a dark trinity of hatred, fear, and deception. They’ve prioritized wealth over ethics, domination over empathy. Therefore, their feigned surprise at the realization that the poison seeds they’ve been nurturing have sprouted into fidelity, avarice, and corruption—an unsettling proliferation of damaging antagonistic forces suffocating the nation—comes off as rather insincere.
The undeniable death of accountability has turned my optimistic projections for the subsequent four years into a vision of an administration founded on tumult, ineptitude and internal disputes. This, with the hope of mitigating the extent of societal, fiscal, and physical injury that we might have to endure. Does the unfolding scenario align with my anticipation? Only time will reveal.
During a recent interaction with our elected representatives, the get-to-be-inaugurated president casually mentioned, ‘I have a feeling I won’t be bracing for another election, unless you find me so remarkable, you’d lobby on my behalf for another term.’ Subsequent reports tell of an outburst of laughter from the assembly.
Decades ago, Democrats chose a strategy for their stand on illegal immigration—a refusal to recognize a distinction between legal and illegal migrants. In an overgeneralization, they frequently assert that Republicans are generally opposed to immigrants. However, in reality, the contentious point for Republicans is not immigration as a whole, but specifically the illegal kind.
Zak Yudhishthu and Bobbie Pennington argue that President-elect Donald Trump’s comments on immigration are detrimental. Yet, they overlook the key difference between legal and illicit immigration. It’s an undeniable fact that immigration brings value. It is a pipeline for workforce influx and a catalyst for novel concepts and business ventures.
We, as the United States, are entitled to decide who we accept as part of our nation. It only makes sense to handpick individuals who possess the required job expertise and whose records don’t cast shadows of criminal tendencies or potential terrorism. As much as we embrace lawful immigrants, we must also strive to block unlawful entries into the country.
Upon reflection, it is becoming increasingly clear to me that my political absolute no-gos are not as universally prevalent as I initially believed.
Blindsided Red Team Faces Surprising Nomination Wave appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
