President Joe Biden gave a noteworthy pardon to his son, Hunter Biden. This move was scrutinized heavily in light of the individuals who were still awaiting trials relating to the Capitol incident on January 6, 2021. These individuals, once fervent supporters of President Trump, felt discarded and neglected. The Biden pardon was met with claims of partiality, suggesting a dual justice system that strongly favored politicians’ offspring.
Injecting hypocrisy into an already controversial move, President Biden refused to extend the same clemency to those involved in the infamous Capitol riot, many of whom were left in limbo, facing an uncertain future while Biden’s son received a ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card. The former President Donald Trump highlighted this point in a social media post, making a strong case for equitable treatment under Justice. But Biden’s pardon remained a prominent talking point.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, voiced his thoughts on the issue, hurling criticism at Biden’s actions. Johnson argued that the Bidens have almost managed to cause irreparable damage to the public’s faith in the justice system, thanks largely to their unprincipled use and misuse of it. This raises questions about political power and the unhealthy influence it might have on law enforcement’s functioning.
Biden’s suddenly announced pardon was a surprise, but it was the underlying implications that rattled many. After long denials of any potential pardon for Hunter Biden, the family’s Thanksgiving gathering in Nantucket, Rhode Island, bore the controversial announcement. There was a distinct air of political influence apparent throughout the entire process, raising justifiable suspicions.
President Biden didn’t just announce the pardon. He defended it, stating that his son had been treated unfairly by the Justice Department. Biden argued that a unnecessary political dimension seemed to have seeped into the process, which he believed led to unjust consequences. His words, however, seemed more like a tale of a father protecting his son, rather than a President upholding justice.
In a move seemingly designed to deflect and disperse blame, Biden went on to claim that his political foes instigated charges against his son, purely to tarnish the senior Biden’s image and act as a deterrent to his election. However, the move reeked of evasion, of shirking off responsibility, further complicating the honesty and integrity of the current administration.
Biden’s pardon justification narrative brought in a peculiar dimension – Hunter Biden’s history with substance abuse. Both father and son pointed out Hunter’s hard-earned sobriety, drawing upon his struggle as a form of blanket absolution for his legal issues. However, Hunter’s issues with substance abuse, while admirable, do not provide grounds for absolution from legal misdoings, indicating a muddled narrative.
The Bidens’ approbation for the pardon did not come without its own assortment of detractors. Former Attorney General Eric Holder described the pardon as ‘warranted’. One can’t help but consider that this endorsement is a clear echo of President Biden’s sentiments. Many would argue that Holder’s perspective, mired in shared political ideology, stands to question the non-partisan workings of justice.
Then comes Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, who dared to go against the party lines to express his disapproval. Polis shed light on the dangerous precedential value the pardon set, warning about how it might be misused in the future. He maintained that Hunter Biden was responsible for his own legal tribulations and should face the consequences accordingly
Polis, acknowledging the paternal instinct driving Biden’s decision, contended that it was disappointing to see Biden put his family before the nation. He argued that such a measure sets an unfavorable precedent, and unfortunately, it has the potential to tarnish the already-questionable reputation of the current President and his decisions, rendering them vulnerable to criticism.
Meanwhile, Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, echoed the Bidens’ unfounded claims, saying the charges against his client were politically motivated. According to Lowell’s logic, the plea agreement fell through because no new evidence came to light, merely reiterating what was already known. However, could Lowell’s argument be an attempt to shift blame and avoid responsibility?
President Biden remained unshaken in his belief that his pardon was justified. He parroted the same defense, suggesting that his son was a victim of politics, not crime. Still, one must ask if political motivations stand to justify actions that may be legally questionable – is this not a loophole in itself that could be manipulated for unjust gains?
On the other hand, the ex-President Trump frequently cited the Justice Department’s investigations into his affairs as politically motivated. Yet, Biden gave his son a pardon while similar treatments weren’t extended to the people indicted in the January 6th incident. The number surpasses 1500, from misdemeanors to violent felonies, with over a thousand issuing guilty pleas.
Closing remarks come from Representative James Comer, who couldn’t help but spotlight the long history of corruption associated with President Biden and his family. Comer suggested that instead of owning up and taking responsibility, the Bidens continue to evade accountability with every possible maneuver, raising more concerns about the state of politics and justice under their watch.
Biden’s Inexcusable Pardon Favoritism Ignites Fury appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
