In the bustling city of New York, the occupants are still patiently waiting to find out the final details of the state budget, a matter that is seemingly unresolved until at least the end of the current week. Evidently, the state legislature has shown signs of giving their stamp of approval to a sum of $22 million that is assigned for the execution of Daniel’s Law. An innovative and necessary reform, Daniel’s Law aims to dispatch highly trained crisis response teams, composed of Emergency Medical Technicians, peers, and individuals specializing in mental health care, in the event of a crisis situation, which historically police have been responsible for.
A recent development has been the approval of a provisional extension by the state’s lawmakers in order to finalize the state budget, given that they were unable to meet the designated deadline of April 1st. This essentially means that New Yorkers will have to wait for at least a few more days to gain clarity on what the final budget encompasses, particularly in terms of the provisions for mental health support services.
One of the significant measures that has managed to garner support from the legislature is Daniel’s Law. This legislation promises the establishment of specialized crisis response teams, comprising of EMTs, peers, and mental health professionals. These teams are aligned to manage crises, a responsibility typically handled by police officers. The namesake and inspiration behind the law, Daniel Prude, had unfortunately lost his life when restrained by police officers in a mental health crisis scenario in Rochester in 2020.
Mental health proponents congregated in Albany earlier this month with the intent to voice their support for reforms led by peers and share their personal stories related to the same. Among these advocates was Christina Sparrock, who is an active member of the task force assigned for Daniel’s Law and spoke about her personal connection to the cause.
According to Christina Sparrock: ‘The importance of Daniel’s Law is deeply personal for me. Being someone with personal experience of life with bipolar disorder, I too had a frightening encounter with the police.’ She added, ‘In an incident during the COVID-19 pandemic, an unidentified individual was repeatedly knocking on my door. Overwhelmed with fear and suspicion, I grabbed a kitchen knife to protect myself, feeling that my personal space and rights were under violation.’
Continuing her harrowing tale, Sparrock shared, ‘The banging eventually ceased, and I rang up the doorman only to discover that it was the police knocking for a wellness check. I realized that if my front door had been left unlocked, they could have entered my home and I might have been shot. In such a situation, the body camera footage would have painted a false image of me being the unruly woman threatening the officers with a knife.’ She added, ‘However, I was just a scared woman, defending herself in her own home, which anyone in a similar situation would have done, irrespective of my mental health condition.’
Asserting her advocacy, Sparrock stated: ‘That’s why I strongly advocate for changes in our system now. When we are in crisis or in need of a wellness check, it should be addressed by crisis-trained professionals with personal experience, demonstrating empathy and compassion, not by police who are trained to respond with force and deal with crimes.’
She further stressed on the necessary adjustments: ‘The 911 helpline should ideally have three types of responses. One for fires, which routes to the fire department; another for medical emergencies, which forwards the call to an ambulance, and the third one for situations related to crime, routed to the police. However, both crime-related situations and matters concerning mental health presently direct to the police. This leads to cases where force is exerted upon individuals struggling with mental health issues, which is grossly unjust.’
Shining a light on the ideal form of public health response, embodied by Daniel’s Law, Sparrock said: ‘Specially trained peers and EMT personnel should be the ones to visit your home in times of a crisis, providing necessary emotional and medical assistance.’ She further emphasized that only these professionals should decide if the individual in distress needs to be hospitalized or requires some other sort of treatment.
Drawing from collective sentiments, one aspect that many individuals across New York State have echoed concerns regarding the budget, most essentially the inefficiencies of numerous systems, particularly in relation to mental health provisions in the community. In a city as densely populated as New York City, the mental health resources are notably inadequate. The city, home to around 9 million inhabitants, has, shockingly, only about 24 available mobile crisis teams.
Such an imbalance in the number of crisis teams vis-à-vis the population to serve means that they simply cannot respond efficiently to crisis requests. Ideally, a mobile crisis team equipped with a peer and a social worker should respond within 28 minutes; however, this becomes impossible due to the overwhelming number of requests from all over the city’s five boroughs. This sadly results in police getting involved in situations that should ideally be handled by adequately funded support programs.
What can be discerned from this situation is that the state is in dire need of significant funding. Our elected officials need to channel funds effectively towards our programs, especially those that have demonstrated consistent successful outcomes.
The proposed one-house budget, which saw its release in the middle of March, highlights that a strong sentiment amongst lawmakers backs a $22 million investment, targeted to steer the implementation of Daniel’s Law. This is a promising indication of the commitment towards meaningful reform in crisis response scenarios, particularly affecting individuals battling mental health issues.
The post Daniel’s Law: A Potential $22 Million Investment in Mental Health Crisis Response appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
