The remarks of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer echoed oddly in the halls of Congress on a recent Tuesday evening. An uncanny tribute was directed towards Cory Booker, his peer from the Garden State. He symbolically lauded Booker for, what he thought, was a record-breaking ‘longest filibuster’ in Senate history, a sentiment that was shared by many in the Democratic caucus. Yet, it was fundamentally incorrect to claim that Booker’s 25-hour long speech was a filibuster, given he wasn’t aiming to obstruct any particular legislative proposal.
This begs the question, why were Democrats applauding Booker’s supposed exercise of this procedural maneuver, despite their past grievances against it? Not so long ago, a substantial faction of Democrats, including Schumer himself, degraded the filibuster, seeking its demise to navigate favorable passage for their political pursuits. They even categorized the filibuster as a ‘Jim Crow relic’. It exposes a glaring hypocrisy when today, finding themselves in the minority, they wield the same procedure as a weapon to stall legislation.
Therefore, it was rather amusing to see Schumer adorn the very ‘filibuster’ he previously derided, with praises for Booker’s marathon speech. Regrettably, the Democrats seem to espouse a flip-flop mentality when it comes to filibusters which paints a vivid picture of their inconsistent political tactics. They conveniently seize complete control and push back against Republicans when in power, yet they fashion themselves as principled underdogs while in the minority, clinging to the same power-strategies they lambasted not long ago.
Highlights of such striking contradictions were evident on the same Tuesday. The first instance was Schumer surprisingly backtracking his stance on the filibuster, a tool he had conveniently dismissed as a ‘Jim Crow relic’ once. The second jarring inconsistency dealt with the acceptance of voter ID rules by Democratic electorates, something the Democrats had ridiculed as ’21st-century Jim Crow’.
Interestingly, a nationwide poll recently brought to light that nearly 81% of citizens, including a noticeable 69% from the Democratic party, are supportive of the voter ID requirements, a mandate Democrats have continually campaigned against. This uncovered an unexpected consensus that surpassed party lines.
Remarkably, President Joe Biden, who consistently endeavored to tarnish red state governments by accusing them of depriving citizens of their voting rights via voter ID laws, seems to be missing the public’s tempo. His string of vehement speeches against such laws appear to have been brushed off, drowned in the vast sea of contrary public sentiment.
Biden’s assault on the importance of voter ID in preserving a fair democracy has turned out to be off-key. What stands out more than his rhetoric is the glaring shortfall between his desired objectives and the failing impact of his political grandstanding. His criticism of the filibuster echoed similar sentiments, but failed to have its intended influence.
Equally, his recent spectacle of heaping praises on Booker’s dramatic stand, termed inaccurately as a filibuster, is unlikely to ignite the grassroots fervor he anticipates. Regrettably, these discrepancies indicate a glaring gap in understanding between the Democratic party’s tactics and the evolving consciousness of the American public.
In an ironic twist, the same tactics the Democrats believed would consolidate their political influence seem to be working against them. The public appears to be increasingly observant of these cynical strategies, generally losing patience with the gross inconsistencies.
Schumer’s hollow accolades for Booker and Biden’s misguided tirades only serve to pull the curtains back further on the Democratic party’s grave misunderstanding of the very people they represent. As these inconsistencies stack up against each other, it’s clear that the Democratic approaches are slowly but surely failing to resonate.
Today’s Democratic party stands in the spotlight, accused of trying to dismantle democratic traditions when convenient only to celebrate them later when the tables have turned. If their behavior on this single Tuesday, flip-flopping about filibusters and voter ID laws, is anything to go by, they seem beholden not to principles but to strategic conveniences.
A troubling question arises from this pattern; what happens when the stakes are higher – will core values remain, or will they be swapped for political expedience? Their stand on these issues seems to suggest an arguably untrustworthy approach to governance, detrimental not only to their credibility but to the health of American democracy as a whole.
As this narrative unfolds, only time will reveal how the Democratic Party’s inconsistent practices will affect their credibility and public sentiment. For now, the public’s eyes are wide open, watching closely as contradictions rise from within the Democratic ranks, gradually eroding the party’s credibility.
The post Biden Fails to Strike Chord with Public on Filibuster Stance appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
