The impact of the Trump Government’s imprudent trade strategies on the US hardwood sector has been profound, leading to a number of outcomes including diminished earnings, aborted orders, and the hefty cost of rerouting shipments on their way to China. China’s reaction was a 125% tariff on U.S. imports in response to the eye-watering 145% duty imposed by the Trump administration on Chinese goods on April 2; a move that sent shockwaves through the hardwood industry. Almost immediately, the prices of specific hardwoods took a nosedive, while numerous timber processors suspended purchases from sawmills, leaving these establishments with few available options for lumber distribution. There was a domino effect with hardwood exporters letting go of employees, shutting down operations and selling off rerouted cargos at knockdown prices.
The tension between the US and China in terms of trade seems to have subsided for the time being, with duty rates on American products headed for China presently set at 10%. There remains, however, a great deal to lose for American hardwood manufacturers. For Pennsylvania, the topmost producer of hardwood lumber nationwide, the situation is particularly intense. In Pennsylvania alone, the timber products industry accounts for over 60,000 jobs and contributes a mammoth $21.8 billion directly and indirectly as much as $39.1 billion to the state’s economy.
The continuity of employment for a large number of forestry professionals including loggers, sawyers, material handlers, and lumber graders, who are typically well remunerated, is hanging by a thread. If tariffs were to be re-imposed, there would be decreased demand for ancillary workers such as truckers and dock staff. It also leaves the fate of Pennsylvania’s global hardwood markets and environmental health in a precarious position.
Without the reassurance of steady pricing and a reliable supply of American hardwoods, international manufactures that highly value these commodities for their aesthetic appeal, resilience, legality, and environmental Friendliness might reconsider their sourcing strategies, potentially turning to European, African, South American, or Asian substitutes.
Losing these markets could be detrimental, and regaining them would likely be a stiff challenge. Building a global market presence is no mean feat; it took years of painstaking efforts, frequent travels, and significant industry investment to enlighten architects, designers, and importers worldwide about the unique attributes of American hardwoods. These committed efforts, together with the US’s standing as a trustworthy trade ally, seemingly didn’t figure in the Trump administration’s decisions when adopting unprecedented tariff rates, only to later revise them.
The damage caused by tariffs tends to intensify when they negatively affect demand from China, particularly because China is the top importer of U.S. hardwoods. The Asian giant represents the largest international market for Red Oak, a species that is most frequently found in the Appalachian Forest. Without this important market, sawmill production capacity on the East Coast, which has already seen a reduction to 6 billion board feet annually from a peak output of 14 billion, primarily due to the tariffs in 2018, could decrease even further.
The globally applauded responsible forest management practiced locally requires proper utilization of all hardwood types growing in American forests. When demand for specific hardwood species dwindles due to loss of markets, this well-regulated forest management is destabilized, leading to lower wood production. A reduced supply of wooden goods also implies lesser carbon capturing and storage (a process integral to climate change mitigation).
U.S. lumber shortages on the global market could potentially increase deforestation rates worldwide. Unhappily, these import duties were imposed by the Trump Government with seemingly scant regard for the power that the Constitution imparts to Congress “to impose and collect taxes, duties, levies and excises.”
Circumventing Congress by activating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act is a move now under legal dispute both by private enterprises and states. Although the courts will eventually rule on whether the tariffs are constitutional, the chance for elected representatives, coming specifically from states reliant on the hardwood forestry, to closely examine the tariffs’ impacts on its populace has unfortunately passed.
This unchecked step skirted around the essential systems of checks and balances that our democracy is founded upon and ultimately denied the public any thorough discussion on actions that could widely affect numerous diligent Americans. Pennsylvania is inextricably linked with premium quality hardwoods, and is widely esteemed as an exemplar of considerate forest administration.
Scattered throughout our Commonwealth are family-owned, multi-generational sawmills that not only offer critical employment opportunities to less urban regions, but also contribute significantly towards local economies. For these families, the respect for and reliance on forest resources run deep. It is quite disheartening, even disquieting, that the interests of such well-established industries — which, like numerous others across our nation, have worked tirelessly to compete in the global arena — seemingly fell by the wayside when the Trump administration decided to undermine America’s standing as a reliable trading partner and risk the livelihoods of so many American companies and employees.
The post Trade Wars: Trump’s Tariffs Undermine U.S. Hardwood Industry appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
