The Governor of Tennessee, Bill Lee, a member of the Republican Party, has given his approval to a new legislation, referred to as the ‘Protecting Everyone Against Crime and Extremism Act’, or PEACE Act. Under this act, an individual will be penalized by law if they choose not to reveal their identity to law enforcement when detained. Another important provision of the act is the introduction of penalties for discarding ‘unwanted leaflets’.
The PEACE Act was proposed by Representative William Lamberth and was instigated in response to a series of troubling events in 2024. These included Neo-Nazi demonstrations in downtown Knoxville and racist assaults on a local synagogue, which caused concern among legislators about escalating discrimination in the region.
The act incorporates a series of amendments to pre-existing laws with the principal aim of safeguarding First Amendment rights, while simultaneously trying to prevent any forms of discriminatory action. In essence, the new law intends to strike a balance between upholding the freedom of expression and curbing potential misuse of this freedom to harbor hate and discrimination.
One amendment demarcates littering, including the act of dispersing ‘unwanted flyers’ on public or privately owned lands, as a Class A misdemeanor. As described in the legislation, this type of ‘litter’ could encompass hate-group pamphlets or political handouts, both of which had been found on doorsteps within Tennessee.
The rule further clarifies that distribution of such literature ‘without permission’ will be considered a violation. This comes following a series of incidents in 2023, where Knoxville properties were blanketed with antisemitic flyers stamped with the insignia of a widely recognized hate group. Similar materials made their invasive appearance in Nashville neighborhoods during July 2024. During this period, hate groups were mounting a particularly hostile incline in their activities, including protests near a synagogue and meddling in city meetings.
However, there are certain Supreme Court precedents that enshrine leafleting for political purposes as protected speech. For instance, the case of Lovell v. City of Griffin, which originated in Georgia in 1938, is a prominent example. In this case, a woman distributing literature as a Jehovah’s Witness was arrested, prompting a significant legal challenge about the fate of this kind of activity.
The local law provision at that time deemed the distribution of any literature without securing prior permission from the city manager to be unlawful. Alma Lovell, the woman charged, contested the validity of this ordinance. On reaching the Supreme Court, the justices argued that this ordinance was overly comprehensive as it failed to outline specific rules regarding how, when, or what types of literature can be disseminated.
The Supreme Court ruling, issued in 1938, stated that such expansive law, ‘..has a nature that undermines the fundamentals of freedom of press by making it subject to permits and censorship.’ This highlighted that press freedom does not only pertain to newspapers or periodic publications, but also includes other forms of literature like pamphlets and leaflets, which have historically played a crucial role in defending liberty.
According to the new act in Tennessee, a person found guilty of ‘littering’ flyers could face a Class A misdemeanor charge. This could lead to imprisonment for up to a year or a fine of up to $2,500 under Tennessee state laws. Supplementing this, the law clarifies that, regardless of circumstance, there is to be no littering or trespassing with intention to ‘unlawfully intimidate others from freely exercising any right or privilege’, nor to intimidate those ‘who have exercised a right or privilege’.
The legislation’s fiscal note suggested that there has been a single conviction over the past decade in cases related to intimidating others from their civil rights exercise. The law was thus not projected to impose any noticeable impact on the judicial system, and it was not expected to cause any potential violation of the First Amendment rights.
Another critical section of the bill mandates that, if law enforcement suspects an individual of committing a crime, that person is required to disclose their name upon request. Refusing to provide accurate identification, or providing a misleading name on these occasions, could result in a Class C misdemeanor, as per the new rules. A similar penalty will be applied if an individual fails to provide the name of an acquainted person who is being detained or arrested by law enforcement.
Additionally, the legislation dictates that it will be counted as a Class B misdemeanor if a person deliberately comes closer than 25 feet to a law enforcement official who is ‘legally engaged in executing their official duties’, after being instructed to keep a distance. This could lead to penalties including up to six months of jail time or a fine of up to $500. The provisions of the law were further refined by an amendment that specifically relates this clause to active crime scenes, traffic interceptions, or situations involving public safety threats.
The PEACE Act also enhances police authority, allowing them to approach, and if necessary, apprehend individuals, given ‘probable cause to believe that a person committed an offense, regardless of whether it occurred in the peace officer’s sight.’ Furthermore, the legislation also criminalizes riding in the back of a box truck, defined as a ‘moving van or any other vehicle manufactured with a connected, enclosed cargo area to the passenger section’. The law also classifies hanging anything over a highway, bridge, overpass, or tunnel without official permission as a Class B misdemeanor.
The post Tennessee’s PEACE Act Secures Gov. Approval appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
