Noted musician Bruce Springsteen took the center stage at a political rally, throwing his weight behind the Democratic contender for 2024 elections, Kamala Harris. This occurred in Philadelphia on October 28, 2024. His endorsement, however, could not help Harris in achieving her aim with President Donald Trump winning the race.
Unsurprisingly, Springsteen’s alliance with the Democrats is not a recent development. His past actions reveal an ongoing pattern. However, it seems his support this time around did not have the desired impact, as evidenced by Harris’s failed presidential bid.
During a music event held in the United Kingdom, Springsteen didn’t hold back his negative viewpoints about the new government. The embittered artist bemoaned the state of the nation he claimed to hold dear, accusing it of being under the rule of a government which, in his words, was ‘corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous’.
In his inflammatory rhetoric, Springsteen placed heavy accusations on the present administration. He asserted that the government was betraying the country’s faithful allies, giving more importance to dictators. He also accused them of suppressing the voices of those fighting for freedom.
The ‘Born in the USA’ singer did not stop there. In his sweeping judgment of the government, he claimed they were entering the academic domain, controlling and withdrawing funds from universities that did not align with their ideologies.
Unmoved by Springsteen’s tirade, President Donald Trump voiced his counter-opinion on his social platform, ‘Truth Social’. Citing his long-standing dislike for both the artist’s music and his political stand, Trump was unafraid to push back.
In his criticism, Trump referenced Springsteen as a ‘dried out prune’ of the rock world, suggesting that the singer should perhaps stick to his music before airing his disapproval on political matters. This harsh riposte showed how Trump perceived Springsteen’s unwarranted intrusion into the political arena as unwelcome.
The President further suggested that Springsteen should observe silence on issues of national importance until he himself was within the country. The implicit criticism here was that the music artist, while living abroad, was being presumptuous in his remarks about domestic affairs.
Adding another layer to this ongoing saga, The Associated Press brought to light Trump’s intentions to probe into legal aspects involving celebrities who endorsed Vice President Harris during her campaign. Springsteen was singled out as one of them.
In Trump’s view, the activities of these celebrities might not be entirely above board. There could be questions surrounding the legitimacy of their campaign donations. This would certainly add another evidence to Trump’s collection against those who openly contested his administration.
This situation shows a feud that extends beyond politics into the realm of personal rivalry. With Springsteen putting his popularity behind Harris and Trump not backing down from his bold statements, one can only wonder what consequences the future holds.
What this feud underscores is the extent to which the polarization of politics has reached not just among politicians, but also among pop-cultural icons more generally. The realm of artistry and music is no longer separate from political discourse.
All we can expect now is to observe how this unusual blending of music and politics will take shape in the coming days. Will it further deepen the divides, or add new dimensions to the political discussions? Only time will tell.
The post Springsteen’s Failed Attempt to Save Harris’s 2024 Run appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
