Following a contentious interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Kamala Harris lashed out with undesired vernacular, as disclosed in a recent book. Harris was in the spotlight, defending the less-than-stellar debate showing by Joe Biden against Donald Trump the previous year. Cooper had stirred the pot by asking if the ex-president ought to step aside due to his disastrous performance and had even raised questions about Biden’s mental acuity. Off-camera, Harris, seething from the interaction, vented to her staff, accusing Cooper of hardly treating her with the respect due to a vice president.
During her conversation with Cooper, Harris was forced to defend her running mate, Biden. Cooper had indicated that many Democrats were nursing apprehensions after Biden’s debate debacle. Harris, putting up a brave face, tried to turn the spotlight on Trump’s repeated untruths, while neglecting to mention the obvious lack of enthusiasm in Biden’s debating skills.
Cooper wasted no time in reminding Harris of her own past debate experiences with Biden, attempting to highlight the obvious discrepancies in his debating style and energy levels over the years. Uncomfortably, Harris seemed to dodge the question, sighing heavily before emphasizing the significance of what the president does, rather than how he debates. One can’t help but notice her deflection, carefully avoiding giving a direct response.
Harris continued, trying to steer the conversation away from the disastrous debate performance, instead focusing on Biden’s ‘historic’ tenure of three and a half years. It is clear, though, that the subpar debate performance weighed heavily on her mind and perhaps even Biden’s legacy.
In some political corners, it is said that Harris’ robust defense was commended, suggesting that her palpable frustration with the CNN interview was somehow justified. Yet, it raised a question: how justified was she in ignoring the evident deterioration in Biden’s debating prowess, particularly when the media spotlight was turned towards it?
The book sheds further light on the inner workings of Biden’s debate preparations. Evidently, his performance in the lead-up to the debate was far short of reassuring. He was described as having become ‘rusty’, which speaks volumes about his readiness, or lack thereof.
Biden’s preparation process was further scrutinized when it was relayed that he spent the entirety of the first day, which was allocated for practice sessions, napping instead. The cavalier disregard for his preparation provided a clear picture of his declining mental alertness; something Harris conveniently side-stepped during her interview with Cooper.
More disturbing observational accounts noted Biden’s debate practice performance ranging between poor and just about satisfactory. His speech was noted as being hesitant and his answers seemed scattered, creating an image of a candidate not entirely in his element.
A troubling element was Biden’s increasingly raspy voice as debate preparations went on. Not only did this add to the increasing concerns about his ability to hold his own in the debate, but it also made hearing him during the simulation sessions a strenuous task.
Taking into account the growing criticisms and all-round disastrous debate performance, Biden eventually decided to bow out from the race for the presidency in 2024. Despite Harris’ best defense attempts, it was clear that the country was not ready to overlook his flagging performance.
The critique was so intense after his debate performance that Biden found it necessary to halt his reelection campaign altogether. Rather than addressing his shortcomings, the former president chose the easier path, surrendering to the increasing backlash.
A shocking disclosure that emerged recently relayed that Biden has been diagnosed with late-stage prostate cancer, casting a fresh round of doubt on his overall health. An already jittery public now has increased health concerns to add to their worries about this former president.
The alarming health news adds another dimension to the lackluster debate performance and increases the concerns regarding his ability to handle the pressures of office. One can’t help but wonder if, in light of this, Harris’s staunch defense of him during her CNN interview was in any way justified.
In summary, the revelations about Biden’s inadequate debate performance, lack of preparation, health scare and withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race depict a grim image of a faltering political veteran. Harris’s attempt to shield Biden did little more than place a superficial bandage over a concerning issue, disguising vital facts that the public deserved to know.
The post ‘Unfit for Command’: Biden’s Debate Disaster Revealed appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
