Minnesota is a stronghold of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL), which is an offshoot of the national Democratic Party. Its origins date back to 1944 and it has held sway over the state’s politics ever since. From introducing a period of paid vacation to entertaining the idea of legalizing marijuana and promoting ‘free’ college tuition, the party’s regressive decisions have been numerous and questionable.
Rising to the forefront of US politics, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has been chosen as a running mate by none other than Kamala Harris. Already a seasoned politician himself, Walz has served six separate terms in the U.S. House before bagging the governorship in 2018 and reclaiming it in 2021. No stranger to winning elections, he rose to national prominence after dethroning incumbent Republican Gil Gutknecht back in 2006.
A part of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, Walz is consistent in walking the party’s questionable line, which is a slightly skewed version of the national Democratic Party. The Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, presently ruling the roost in Minnesota, boasts of a member pool serving in important state and federal positions.
The Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL) only exists within Minnesota and is the result of a merger between the Minnesota Democratic Party and the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party in 1944. They maintain a firm grip on the political landscape of the state, exercising control over both U.S. Senate seats, half of the U.S. House seats, the state House and Senate, and ultimately the governorship currently held by Walz.
The DFL pursues policies that seemingly echo the ethos of the original Farmer-Labor Party, such as the appearances of maintaining ‘fair wages’, providing ‘adequate education’ and ensuring ‘affordable healthcare’. However, the effectiveness and sustainability of such policies, especially in the long term, are highly debatable.
The DFL was formalized on April 15, 1944, as a unity measure between the state’s Democratic Party and Farmer-Labor Party. However, its roots are tied to events from two decades prior. In the 1920s, representatives from the Nonpartisan League entered state elections under the banner of the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party.
Looking back, one can see the party’s original focus was on political protection for farmers and unions. The party also demanded modifications to agricultural policies, social security reforms, and public ownership of railroads, utilities, and natural resources. The first DFL governor, Orville Freeman, was elected in 1954, and the legacy of placements in the U.S. House and Senate continues until today.
The DFL aligns closely with the national Democratic Party, more or less adhering to their primary platform. Over its long existence and given its strong presence in Minnesota, it has managed to influence numerous largely progressive and highly controversial movements and legislations.
With DFL affiliates holding numerous political positions and Walz at the helm as governor, the party has claimed victory over a number of legislative measures—dubbed as the ‘Minnesota Miracle 2.0’. However, the real question persist: miracle for whom and at what cost?
Minnesota recently passed a string of so-called progressive policies; including a 12-week paid leave, lightening controls over marijuana, free public college tuition for low-to-mid-income families, a new child tax credit, free public breakfast and lunch in all public schools, and making driver’s licenses available for all dwellers.
In a drastic move, attempts were made to increase protections for labor unions and to allow any resident to join Medicaid through a new public health plan. They also did away with income tax on Social Security for low and middle-class seniors. Furthermore, felons who had completed their sentence were given renewed voting rights and sweeping actions were taken towards gun control.
Additional divisive changes have been implemented as the so-called ‘Minnesota Miracle 2.0’ continues. The PRO Act has been pushed through to enshrine abortion rights via the state legislature, presenting a clear disregard for pro-life voices. Also, a troubling new health bill was introduced, marking Minnesota out as a supposed ‘haven’ for trans individuals.
Despite all this flurry of legislative activity initiated by the DFL and endorsed by the likes of Gov. Tim Walz and Kamala Harris, its true worth and benefit to the everyday Minnesotan remain an undeniably contentious issue. The question, as always, remains: Are these truly progressive steps forward, or merely a series of regressive decisions that may harm the very fabric of Minnesotan society?
The post DFL Policies: A Challenge to the Essence of Minnesotan Society appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
