Executive orders, a contentious gear cogs in the machinery of the presidential arsenal, allow the president to sidestep Congress, enabling big decisions to be made unilaterally. However, this presidential prerogative is shackled by constraints that limit its authority and scope. Exercising this endowment, the executive branch, led by the president, can unleash directives through an avenue commonly referred to as an executive order.
A documented tradition among presidents is the utilization of executive orders as an expedited component of law-making especially when Congress is ensnared in frustratingly slow procedures. A case in point was during the COVID-19 pandemic when financial aids were stuck in the legislative quagmire of Congress. It fell upon President Trump, pressured by circumstance, to employ executive action to ensure the disenfranchised received their stimulus checks.
Executive orders have been instrumental in carving crucial moments in the history of our nation. In 1863, the paradigm-shifting Emancipation Proclamation signed by Abraham Lincoln disrupted the slavery infrastructure in Confederate states. During the Great Depression, yet another milestone was Executive Order 7034 issued in 1935 by Franklin D. Roosevelt, a life-raft that created jobs for the teeming millions grappling with economic hardships.
Despite their palpable influence, executive orders are not a magic wand wielded by the president. They are ensnared in a web of limitations – a safeguard against undermining pre-existing laws or subverting constitutional authority. A signed executive order, barring passage of a fresh law, presents a tough nut to crack for those seeking its reversal – a rarity in the annals of American politics.
A stark demonstration of the pushback against executive overreach was caustically evident in the recent public showdown featuring President Biden. His attempt at introducing loan forgiveness via an executive order was met with staunch resistance, culminating in a Supreme Court hearing. The judgment landed in favor of those challenging his authority, ruling that the President had crossed the lines of his constitutional jurisdiction.
Alternatively, executive orders can also meet their Waterloo at the hands of states. Armed with the Tenth Amendment that safeguards state powers, states can wage a legal war against the federal government. A glaring example of such a fracas is the standoff between California and the federal government over the domain of immigration policy.
A habit as old as time itself among administrations is the continuity of executive orders from one tenure to the next. However, a new incumbent in the Oval Office can turn the tables on these mandates through the issuance of fresh orders; a strategy frequently deployed in areas such as environmental policy. Nonetheless, this tactic is rife with political maneuvering and promulgates a sense of impermanence in policy matters.
A cavalier use of executive orders, whether by President Trump, President Biden, or their illustrious predecessors, demands introspection. Each wave of elections offers the power of change in the hands of the voters. Therefore, the frequency and nature of executive orders under a presidency should be a yardstick for public evaluation of government effectiveness.
Despite their potential for swift action, executive orders should not usurp the dais of Congress’s democratic process and elected representatives. It is of prime importance that Congress and executive orders coexist – not replace one another – to address the pressing issues of the nation. Otherwise, the risks of skewed governance and an unbridled presidency might upset our democratic balance.
To sum up, executive orders are a double-edged sword. On one side, they can catalyze expedient action bypassing the arduous process of Congress. On the other, they face a myriad of checks and balances from courts, states, and the public, leaving no room for misuse of the mechanism. Their history has been marked with both commendable achievements and sobering overreaches.
The post Biden’s Overreach: A Stark Demonstration of Power Misuse appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
