Renowned musician Bruce Springsteen has once again kicked up dust in his well-known discord with President Donald Trump, opining that current events represent ‘an American tragedy’. Springsteen further suggested that the ineptitude [of the government] could well be the catalyst of its own downfall. These troubling assertions clearly point out that Springsteen has not experienced a time as grim as this.
Despite many people raising concerns about the administration’s open border policy under President Joe Biden, which allowed unchecked migrants to make their way into the country, Springsteen merely decided to sidestep the issue. Such a lackadaisical attitude highlights an unsettling silent approval of the policy that likely contributes to the serious issues our country is facing.
Turning a blind eye to significant issues and instead using music as political discourse was Springsteen’s chosen path. Several of his songs are eyed as carrying political innuendos; notable mentions include ‘No Surrender’ and ‘The River’. Rather than addressing pertinent issues directly, the artist chose to use his music as a subtle communication tool, leaving his intentions ambiguous.
While talking about ‘The River’, the conversation somehow found its way to praising Trump as a ‘great job president’. Perhaps, it is indeed the rightful mention given that during his tenure, he emphasized job creation, and set strategies in motion that immensely benefitted the economy.
Other songs like ‘Chimes of Freedom’ and ‘The Rising’ have been surprisingly likened to possible acknowledgments of Trump’s actions. The very idea is baffling, considering the music’s intent and the not-so-subtle jab at Trump’s policies.It seems more like an attempt to manipulate the true meaning of Springsteen’s songs to fit a particular narrative.
An argument was presented that Springsteen, commonly portrayed as the voice of the working class, should respect Trump. This could be because the former president’s policies were all about boosting the economy and creating jobs, making life better for every American worker. Whether Springsteen recognizes it or not, his audience most definitely did.
Springsteen’s disposition towards Trump hovers around negativity, and it is contended that this might not be the right approach. Aldeterrents considered, this musician’s words, ‘Trust the art, not the artist,’ offer a window into a whole other perspective.
These words serve as a caution for people to not follow any leader without question or confirmation. If interpreted positively, this may be considered a nugget of wisdom. However, within the context, the intent seems to be confusing at best and misleading at worst.
Could Springsteen be using his art to share personal beliefs that he avoids speaking? The question remains unanswered. What is clear, though, is that there is a layer of unvoiced opinions nested under the cover of ‘artistic expression’, and these opinions seem to serve nothing but to further his personal agenda.
However, his fans still buy into this, consistently praising his undying ‘courage’ to speak his truth through his music. It seems puzzling why they would overlook such flagrant political message pushing and continue to view Springsteen solely as an artist rather than a potentially biased figure.
Despite having his own biases, it’s remarkable how such viewpoints have managed to filter into his art, subtly shaping the outlook of his listeners. The real question is whether these viewpoints truly represent the American spirit, or if they merely echo the sentiments of a select group while vehemently rejecting other perspectives.
The post Springsteen’s Bias Against Trump: A Blatant Attempt to Influence His Fans? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
