The Supreme Court has recently given the go-ahead to the Trump administration’s measures aimed at shrinking and revamping the federal workforce. Up until now, these measures had been put on hold due to a district court injunction. In response to recognized inefficiencies in the federal bureaucracy, President Trump had initially mandated in an order this past February for federal agencies to seek and eliminate unnecessary expenses and to counter insularity.
To facilitate this effort, Trump encouraged agency leaders to make sweeping ‘reductions in force’ that align with respective laws. An essential part of this restructuring initiative was a hiring freeze, combined with the option of voluntary deferred resignations. The lead on this initiative was held by Elon Musk, in association with his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cost-cutting task force. Despite Musk’s recent departure, DOGE continues to push forward with its objectives.
The Supreme Court resolution was not without opposition, specifically from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The only dissenter, Jackson did not express any specific concerns regarding individual downsizing plans. Instead, she emphasized the need to maintain the current state of affairs, putting a pause on dismissals until the American Federation of Government Employees lawsuit is resolved.
Jackson voiced her concern about the potential unrectifiable damage that could stem from arbitrary and mass layoffs of government staff. Her disappointment was palpable when she stated, ‘… this Court appears ready to unleash the President’s demolition team early in this litigation process.’ The majority of justices viewed this differently, with the consensus being that the President’s executive order is likely lawful, hence, they opted to lift the injunction.
The Supreme Court’s decision was welcomed by a spokeswoman from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. She claimed that her office is content with the Supreme Court’s recognition of the lawfulness of Trump’s order and the consequent instructions. The spokeswoman stated that the OPM will collaborate with agencies to cultivate a cost-efficient and effective federal workforce that would improve services for American citizens at a significantly lower cost.
At the start of the month, the OPM released its inaugural assessment of job trends during the Trump administration. As of March 31, the federal civilian workforce totaled approximately 2.3 million, denoting the elimination of more than 23,000 positions since the last fiscal year’s end. The Federal Reserve depicts a reduction by 57,000 federal workers since the year’s beginning.
The OPM’s initial data suggests the effects of Trump’s hiring freeze. Additionally, the OPM stated that many employees, despite receiving reduction-in-force notices or dismissal, still appeared on payrolls due to their coverage by court orders. With the current lifting of the injunction, these federally employed individuals could potentially face job loss.
The Supreme Court’s ruling hasn’t been well-received by all, with the American Federation of Government Employees and other challengers expressing disappointment. As defined in a collective statement, the verdict greatly undermines our democratic principles and puts at risk crucial services that Americans depend on.
The group of challengers further remarked, ‘This resolution does not alter the unmistakable fact that the indiscriminate reorganization of government functions and mass layoffs of federal workers without getting congressional approval is in direct violation of our Constitution.’ The aftermath of the decision seems to suggest that specific departmental layoff plans still lack certainty.
Following the release of the Supreme Court’s judgment, the State Department declared its intention to continue with its reorganization scheme. In contrast, the Veterans Affairs announced their decision to put on hold plans to lay off around 80,000 staff members. With VA being the largest payroll among the 18 cabinet-level departments, it appeared the most likely to undergo reductions.
Nevertheless, VA now anticipates a decrease of 30,000 employees by this fiscal year’s end, primarily through regular attrition, early retirements, deferred resignations, and the ongoing federal hiring freeze. In its mission to improve government efficiency, the DOGE claims to have saved $190 billion taxpayer funds by canceling costly government contracts, selling assets, battling fraud, stopping grants, revising programs, job cuts, among other things.
However, some experts dispute the credibility of DOGE’s cost-cutting allegations. There’s an uncertainty surrounding whether, without Musk’s leadership, the effort to downsize the workforce will persist. Federal employee compensation totals around $400 billion, a fraction compared to federal spending estimated near $7 trillion.
The post Supreme Court Approves Trump’s Federal Workforce Downsizing Measures appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
