The head of U.S. public health policy is unexpectedly advocating for a few hundred Canadian ostriches. The plea comes as Kennedy petitions Canada to spare the lives of approximately 400 ostriches that have potentially been in contact with avian flu. The proposition is that these birds may provide unique understanding into the functioning mechanism of the avian virus, and therefore should not be culled.
These ostriches currently reside at Universal Ostrich Farms located in British Columbia. Previous exposure to the bird flu in the prior winter had led to the unfortunate demise of 69 ostriches at this facility. In the ensuing months, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency has been advocating for a comprehensive wipeout to prevent any further spread.
The farm’s proprietor and several other officials and key commentators have argued against this cull, citing it as unnecessary, potentially unconstitutional, and detrimental to possible scientific discoveries. The vehement insistence on complete eradication aligns with the precautionary approach but also undeniably comes into conflict with the potential scientific value of these surviving birds.
Kennedy, an advocate for science and life, has thus fervently appealed not just for the birds’ survival but for the advancement of knowledge. He has asked Canada to refrain from culling the ostriches; instead, he is proposing additional investigation and testing. Kennedy has directly communicated the idea to the Canadian authorities that the ostriches could present significant opportunities to contribute to scientific knowledge if studied under properly controlled conditions.
This intervention is not an uncharacteristic act for Kennedy. Earlier in the year, he had similarly proposed that the avian flu should be allowed to naturally run its course through a group of birds located on American farms. The reason for the proposal was based on the potential benefits and scientific insight that could be gained from studying the antibodies of surviving birds.
Despite such suggestions, public health experts warn against such unorthodox measures. Letting a potent virus like bird flu run rampant in such a manner could potentially be the trigger for a worldwide pandemic, they caution. These experts claim Kennedy’s methods could unintentionally provide the virus a massive platform to evolve and grow stronger.
Kennedy, though, does not actually have authority over animal health protocols in the United States. This, however, hasn’t deterred him from further pressing his hypothesis and advocating for his contentious approach to observing viral propagation in bird populations.
While some might be inclined to dismiss Kennedy’s actions with a chuckle, others might find it concerning. It’s hard to ignore the implications when the person calling to spare avian flu-affected ostriches is also responsible for managing a country’s healthcare system.
There’s currently an ongoing legal dispute in Ottawa over this topic. The outcome of this case could have implications not only for the ostriches in discussion, but also for the broader question of the balance between public health responsibility and scientific experimentation.
Kennedy’s ultimate goal is for Canada to be a landscape of learning for this bird flu. Should he have his way, it might end up being the place where the avian flu learns to develop resistance.
The post U.S Public Health Head Pleads for Canadian Ostriches amid Avian Flu Fears appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
