An antique item carved with intricate details depicting a grasshopper is up for auction in a London house. No concrete evidence exists to prove it originated from the era of King Tutankhamen, the boy pharaoh. However, its exorbitant estimated price tag hovers around $675,000. The Guennol Grasshopper, a container made of ivory and wood, is scheduled for the auction block this weekend.
King Tutankhamen’s treasure-laden tomb was unearthed by Howard Carter, a British archaeologist, who dedicated years to examining and cataloging the multitude of precious relics found inside. These fascinating pieces included life-sized statuettes of the young Egyptian pharaoh, resplendent thrones, and the funeral mask of King Tut himself. Carter’s expeditions, however, weren’t entirely devoid of controversy.
Carter has been accused of pocketing some of these priceless artifacts himself. Among these, specialists in Egyptian antiquities have long claimed there was an item that Carter may have expropriated – an item now up for auction, a matter that stirs debate among experts who claim it should not be sold.
Despite these controversies, the artifact known as Guennol Grasshopper will go on the auction block in a London house this Sunday. The container, made out of ivory and wood, takes the form of the chirpy insect, impressively designed with wings that open to disclose a space for perfume storage.
The bidding house propagates that the Guennol Grasshopper originated from King Tut’s era, thus implying it has significant historical value. Its estimated monetary value, consequently, is a staggering 500,000 pounds or approximately $675,000. The auctioneer mentions the item’s previous transaction occurred at a hefty $1.2 million tag.
However, the auction house claims that there’s no documented evidence suggesting this artifact originated from King Tut’s tomb. Their statement asserts the artifact’s absence from any official inventory records of the excavation.
Despite this, the artifact’s anticipated origin isn’t easily dismissed. Some specialists argue that the item’s design and impeccable preservation strongly suggest it originated from Tutankhamen’s reign during the 14th century B.C. They believe it’s highly plausible the object emerged from a sealed environment, like King Tut’s untouched tomb.
Historical narratives do indicate that Carter sold a similar item after he returned to England. This raises debate about whether such artifacts should be returned to Egypt, understanding this situation as a matter of ethical concern. It’s important to note that some experts have previously stated that Carter may have taken a variety of artifacts, including those bearing animal designs, many of which are on display in Western museums.
The absence of the grasshopper artifact’s documentation does not necessarily imply it didn’t originate from Tutankhamen’s tomb. It’s plausible that Carter omitted any stolen items from the tomb’s official inventory list. Accordingly, some experts argue that the auction house should have consulted with the Egyptian authorities.
Despite the arguments, the auction house confidently states it has adhered to all applicable laws and international standards related to selling such objects. They claim to have taken all necessary steps to validate the artifact’s provenance. A London-based company dealing with stolen artifacts has granted a ‘certificate of clearance’, stating the Grasshopper does not figure on any stolen-artifact list.
This situation presents an intricate problem. While the artifact’s origins remain questionable, the Egyptian authorities have never reported the item stolen or requested its return. This ambiguity persists even though, during the search for Tutankhamen’s tomb, Carter and his patron had anticipated significant financial gain.
Public memory still recalls the situation back in December 1922 when Carter revealed Tutankhamen’s tomb to the world. An article at that time declared Carter’s untiring efforts would go unrewarded since the Egyptian government decided to consider the tomb unviolated by thieves and thereby kept all the findings.
The situation today expresses an ongoing dilemma regarding the provenance of such artifacts. For instance, the grasshopper artifact has been associated with King Tut’s tomb for years, often regarded as part of his treasure. Some experts urge a consideration of the ethical implications involved with the sale and possible repatriation of such contentious artifacts. The echo of these sentiments suggests the need to prioritize doing what is right over providing historical proof.
The post Controversial ‘King Tut’ Artefact Up For Auction in London appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
