Given the recent foreign policy trajectory showcased by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during the 12-day altercation between Israel and Iran, the previously taut relations between Riyadh and Tehran may be gently steering towards improvement. Interestingly, in seeming contrast to prior alliances, Saudi Arabia opted not to accede to American petition to proffer Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) interceptors to Israel amidst the strife. This decision was particularly noteworthy as Israel articulated a dearth of THAAD interceptors, a lack which resulted in Iran’s ballistic missile attacks on various Israeli cities.
The urgency for additional interceptors was underscored by the United States as it sought out help from Saudi Arabia for their Israeli allies. However, despite persistent appeals, Riyadh responded with a firm negation, pointing to a shift in its foreign policy. An official’s words elucidate this stance, stating, ‘During the war, we asked everyone to donate. We even attempted to engage in deal-making. Our requests weren’t targeted at one specific country.’
The US bid to Saudi Arabia was placed at a time when Riyadh was preparing to receive its inaugural THAAD battery, an investment made from its own coffers. Following a ceasefire concluded between Israel and Iran nine days prior, Saudi Arabia proceeded to launch the battery. This situational backdrop adds depth to Saudi Arabia’s decision to withhold from contributing interceptors to Israel.
An interesting aspect of this scenario was the U.S. government’s appeal to United Arab Emirates to also share interceptors with Israel. The response from the UAE was not publicly disclosed, leading to uncertainty and amplified intrigue. This took place amidst concerns that Israel might deplete Washington’s ballistic missile interceptor stockpile.
There are many who interpret the choice of Saudi Arabia and UAE to not offer assistance to Israel as indicative of their resolution to distance themselves from the conflict. It is noteworthy that the context of this decision was the recently rejuvenated relations between these nations. In the wake of such developments, speculations regarding Saudi Arabia fostering better relations with Iran have also surfaced.
Over recent times, there have been significant diplomatic interactions between Riyadh and Tehran at the highest echelons. A conspicuous example was the meeting between Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi in Jeddah on July 8. The discussion was characterized by the Crown Prince’s denunciation of Israel’s aggression on Iranian territories, and an affirmation of his stance against any military action which compromises the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Islamic Republic.
According to inside sources, Saudi Arabia is quite unambiguous in its intention to maintain positive vibes with Iran. Its communication with Western media underscored that Saudi Arabia looks forward to continuing its diplomatic dialogue with Tehran. This revelation is significant, considering the historical hostility that has defined the relations between the two nations.
China played a crucial role in this context by facilitating diplomatic initiatives in 2023, which eventually led to the formal restoration of ties between Iran and Saudi Arabia after a long period of estrangement. This mending of ties hints at a broader shift evolving in Middle Eastern politics.
The destabilizing incident on October 7, and the subsequent war have seemingly altered the power dynamics in the Middle East. In the aftermath of these events, Iran, despite its proxies being weakened, is not viewed as a potent threat as it once was.
An expert perspective from a scholar at the Middle East Institute captures this shifted paradigm aptly: ‘The Iran of 2022… is not the Iran of 2025,’ This opinion not only points to Iran’s changing position but also indirectly casts light on Israel’s evolving role in the region.
In a somewhat dramatic turn of events, it is Israel, following its triumphant stance in 2025, that is increasingly perceived as a potential source of instability across the Middle Eastern region. Thus, the predictions and awareness regarding any future conflicts or diplomatic trends are tinged with the colors of uncertainty.
Ultimately, the changing dynamics and shifting alliances in the Middle East indicate that the regional geopolitical landscape is in a state of flux. This does not only have implications for the nations directly involved, but also bears global implications considering the significant strategic and economic interest vested in the Middle East.
It is crucial to monitor the ripple effects of these shift, the roads leading to possible peace or new conflicts, and the wider cascading impacts on the geopolitical jigsaw. The prevailing snapshot of the Middle East – where adversities lead to unexpected alliances, hostilities soften and previously unimaginable possibilities become plausible – is a testament to this complexity.
The post Saudi Arabia Signals Potential Thaw in Relations with Iran appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
