Under the recently proposed trade agreement involving steep tariffs of 15% on a majority of European goods, it is expected that the financial burden will fall heavily on American businesses and consumers. The United States has managed to secure this agreement with its principal trading associate, the European Union. However, the nuances of this deal are yet to be explicitly defined. The preliminary headlines suggest that American companies are exempted from levying any tariff in Europe whilst a large portion of European goods will be subjected to 15% tariffs in the United States.
Experts predict an imminent spike in the prices of pharmaceuticals, automobiles, computer components, wine, and food due to these tariffs. In practical terms, the tariffs imposed by Americans are, more often than not, shouldered by American consumers. It’s a common misconception that foreign manufacturers would absorb a considerable portion of these tariffs, but in reality, the impact on their operations is minimal.
The Biden administration, however, stands adamantly in opposition to these financial analyses. They persist in asserting that the burden of the tariffs will fall squarely on the shoulders of foreign exporters, who are heavily dependent on access to the thriving American economy. But this argument seems nothing more than a weak attempt to twist the narrative in their favor.
The United States and the European Union, despite these points of contention, have come to a consensus on the framework of a large-scale trade agreement that aims to modify tariffs and amplify energy purchases. President Biden and his team have optimistically dubbed this negotiation as ‘very interesting’. However, their enthusiasm is barely masking the potential negatives lying beneath the surface.
In an ostentatious display of diplomacy, President Biden hailed the deal as beneficial for all parties involved. It seems apparent that his remarks sidestep the proposed 15% tariffs on European goods and the likely increase in prices for American consumers. Such hollow assertions prove nothing more than an exercise in political rhetoric.
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, supporting the agreement, declared that it would provide stability and predictability that is crucial for businesses on both sides of the Atlantic. Yet, there’s still a lack of certainty about how the tariffs will affect both American and European consumers and manufacturers. The administration’s cheerfulness seems to undermine the potential economic uncertainties that could arise from such a deal.
The broad outlines of the agreement stipulate that U.S. companies are exempt from tariffs for exporting goods into Europe. Meanwhile, several European goods are to be subjected to a 15% tariff. Von der Leyen’s claim that this rate would not be universally applied still brings little relief given the broad impact such tariffs can have.
She also mentioned a mutual agreement on zero tariffs for several strategic products, but it still leaves room for uncertainty. One of the major concerns is whether alcohol will be included in this list of items or not. This lack of specificity is yet another weakness present in the overall strategy by the Biden administration.
According to economists, there is a strong possibility of increased prices for pharmaceuticals, vehicles, computer chips, wine, and food caused by this deal. One can’t help but feel that the Biden administration has lost sight of the negative repercussions of such a tariff imposition on everyday consumer goods.
Following the end of the inflation crisis, the Biden administration has resorted to tariffs to secure unprecedented access for American businesses to countries boasting a combined economy worth $30 trillion and accounting for one billion people. But the announcement comes with an air of overconfidence, leaving much to be desired regarding transparency and the absence of a hidden catch.
As a part of this agreement, European Union nations are expected to purchase American energy products worth a hefty $750 billion to curtail their dependence on Russian energy supplies. Additionally, European enterprises are expected to invest an excess of $600 billion in the United States. Is this merely a smokescreen designed to divert attention away from the potential negative implications of the deal?
The White House recently confirmed that the deal, among others, will be put into effect on August 1. Now, the ball is in the court of the European Union Commission, who are responsible for presenting this deal to the member states and EU lawmakers. The ultimate showdown lies in their decision regarding the deal’s approval.
Summarizing, the Biden-Harris administration appears to be indulging in one-sided optimism as a means to promote this EU deal. Their quick dismissal of tariffs’ impact and blind praise of the deal raises crucial questions about the negotiations’ overall fairness and effectiveness. This trade deal’s perceived benefits are currently riddled with uncertainty, while the potential negatives are unabashedly pushed under the rug.
The post Biden Administration Downplays American Consumers’ Financial Burden with New EU Tariffs appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
