Under the shift in administrative policy, federal contributions to U.S. programs focused on preventing gun violence has experienced more than a 50% cut, impacting monetary aid of about $158 million. The funds had been primarily dispersed amongst high-profile cities such as New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, DC, and Baltimore. These cities were beneficiaries of the now-defunct Community Violence Intervention (CVI) grants, which originally encompassed an aid package of over $300 million, governed by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Tracing the fate of these CVI grants, 69 of the original 145 were suddenly discontinued in April. The discontinuation of these CVI contributions signifies a wider downsizing undertone within the department’s Office of Justice Programs, the arm responsible for grant allocation. In April alone, this branch terminated 365 grants amounting to an estimated $811 million. The impact of this decision touches various sectors, including public safety initiatives and victim assistance services.
An insider from the DOJ rationalised this drastic measure by commenting that the financial support for gun violence intervention was cut as it ‘no longer fulfilled the program’s goals or agency’s priorities.’ Lots of the Office of Justice Programs grants have come under the scanner for review. The evaluation parameters include, among others, the extent of their support to the law enforcement agencies and their contribution towards countering violent crime.
Previously, significant resources from the CVI grants stemmed from the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which was a strategic initiative of then President Joe Biden, intended to curb the alarming trend of increasing gun violence in the country. Part of this strategy also entailed the establishment of the inaugural White House Office for Gun Violence Prevention.
However, a momentous policy alteration was witnessed with the introduction of the Trump administration. This body resulting from Biden’s initiative was lifted on the first day of President Trump’s term, marking the reorientation of efforts. Before the advent of Biden-specific funding, most of the monetary support towards these gun prevention initiatives was sourced from state finances.
Looking back five years, a majority of these gun violence prevention measures, if in existence then, were operating on tight budgets without substantial federal backing in the form of multi-million-dollar investment. With the allocated grants, a comprehensive range of CVI programs were launched to forestall incidents of shooting.
These included resource allocation in the form of training outreach teams with skills needed to diffuse and mediate conflicts, employing social workers with the aim of connecting individuals to suitable services and job prospects, and also hospital-based assistance for victims of gun violence.
The topic of gun violence has been a significant point of concern in the U.S., with deaths resulting from such incidents showing a boost of over 50% from 2015 to the frightening peak in 2021 of 21,383. A relieving downturn in this trajectory has been observed since. While prevention funding was predominantly allocated to cities like NYC, Chicago and Los Angeles, southern counterparts like Memphis, Selma in Alabama, and Baton Rouge in Louisiana also garnered this financial support.
In the case of these southern cities, reliance on federal grants was higher due to a lack of sufficient backing on the state level. The recently effectuated funding reductions pose a threat to the future viability of the Community Violence Intervention initiatives amidst Black and Latino communities where they represent years of deep rooted work and commitment.
Public opinion is divided regarding the value and efficacy of the CVI strategy. Detractors suggest that federal funds could be better allocated to law enforcement, as a more direct means to combat gun violence. There is also a perspective that views these programs as fundamentally ‘anti-gun’ and essentially a medium for the allocation of federal taxpayer money to anti-gun nonprofits campaigning against firearm ownership.
However, it is important to note that this belief is not universally echoed within the law enforcement community. In a demonstration of solidarity, 18 law enforcement groups from across diverse locations such as Louisville, Minneapolis, Tucson and Omaha, have rallied together to voice a request to the Attorney General.
Their united appeal involves reinstating funding allocations that have led to ‘measurable and significant reductions in violence and homicides.’ They emphasize that the CVI programs are not just feel-good initiatives but ‘lifesaving, law-enforce-ment-enhancing strategies that work’.
The statement was released in June, underscoring the real-life impacts that the CVI programs have had in communities, including significant reductions in violent crimes and homicides. With the disruptions caused by the recent federal funding cuts, these organizations now find themselves grappling with the imminent challenge of keeping their operations afloat without the previously substantial financial support.
The post Federal Contributions to Gun Violence Prevention Cut by Half appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
