The shift in the Labour Government’s stance towards civil unrest in the vicinity of migrant accommodations from the previous year to now offers a notable case study. These reactions range from those following the tragic events in Southport to the present-day demonstrations. Last year’s violent protests necessitated a firmer state intervention, which received widespread public approval, compared to the recent summer incidents.
On the 4th of August the previous year, freshly elected Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer commenced his statement on the disturbances, condemning them as ‘far-right thuggery’. He ended his statement dwelling on the same theme, unequivocally giving a name to the unrest as instances of ‘far-right thuggery’.
While it was blatantly obvious that some far-right elements were involved in the protests, Starmer seemed oblivious to the actual fears of the common citizens. These people were neither thuggish troublemakers nor aligned with any far-right ideologies. The current shift in Starmer’s approach, as the protests rumble on, is visible as Labour politicians make deliberate efforts to empathetically address protestors’ anxiety over large-scale immigration.
A quote from a recent Cabinet meeting highlights this change. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner acknowledged the immense impact on society from ‘economic insecurity, the swift process of de-industrialisation, immigration, and effects on the local communities and public services’. Furthermore, Starmer’s spokesperson echoed her thoughts, pointing to ‘high immigration, including undocumented entries, over the past decade, and its effects on the social fabric and communal harmony’.
What is the reason behind this newfound perspective, one might ask? The rise of the Reform Party seems to be a primary factor at play on the surface. The recent electoral performance and surveys indicate that the Reform Party now holds sway over a substantial portion of the populace, a fact not lost on the Government. It is now clear that the Reform Party has positioned itself on a likely trajectory to power.
Despite this shifting political landscape, the overarching focus is now leaning towards crime, public service shortcomings, and economical matters. The underlying sense of dissatisfaction and a feeling of inequity among working-class voters across Britain are what could potentially alter the political dynamics and balance of power.
There is a palpable sentiment among the working-class community that the nation is faltering and bereft of any genuine concept of fairness. This should not be interpreted in the sense that grievances regarding immigration are the root cause of the discontentment among the white working-classes. It is merely to acknowledge that a resentment towards extensive immigration indeed exists in this segment and cannot be dismissed outright.
To phrase it differently, the working-class electorate is of the view that the country is faltering with a significant deficit in the application of natural justice. Previously, matters relating to national and cultural interests have barely been a priority for most working-class voters, yet it appears to be gaining momentum rapidly.
Regardless of this, there is the emergence of a bona fide working-class movement born out of frustration in the UK today. The Reform party stands to gain the most in the immediate future from this new development.
Should the mainstream political parties fail to effectively address at least a portion of these concerns, they run the risk of being marginalized.
The post Labour Government Changes Tactics to Manage Civil Unrest appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
