Shadowed by an atmosphere of a suspense novel, the plot thickens with the unveiling of a British whistleblower with military background, confidential interactions with elite members of the justice system, clandestine spreadsheets allegedly binding a UK bank to Iran’s terror and military networks. At the heart of this narrative lies Standard Chartered, the UK’s fifth leading bank, also recognized for its sponsorship of Liverpool Football Club. The bank has been penalized with close to $2bn by US authorities due to violations of sanctions against Iran through its US branch, with acknowledgements of guilt in 2012 and 2019. In the latest turn of events, the bank faces new allegations, which it denies, that could potentially end with further penalties.
Julian Knight, the whistleblower in question, who formerly served in the RAF and later a compliance executive at the bank, is levelling serious accusations against Standard Chartered. He suggests that the bank’s previously confessed transgressions do not cover the full extent of their dealings, alleging concealment of an additional $10bn in transactions involving Iranian organizations carried out through its New York branch.
As the saga of illicit dealings unfolds, certain transactions, allegedly related to Iran’s military, nuclear program, and US-designated terror organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas, have surfaced. The bank roundly denies conducting transactions for terror groups. Allegedly, these controversial transactions took place between 2008 and 2013, a period following Standard Chartered’s public 2007 decision to halt new business with Iranian customers as US pressure on the Islamic Republic intensified.
In what seems like a plot twist, Knight, along with another whistleblower, Robert Marcellus, a currency trader, claims to have discovered these concealed transactions in retrospect by revisiting spreadsheets and documents submitted to US authorities in the past. But they were met with apparent inaction when they attempted to provide evidence to New York attorney general Letitia James’s office last year.
Complicating matters, the Department of Justice intervened last month, deciding to reevaluate previous court decisions related to the phenomenon. This development could prove to be detrimental for Standard Chartered, potentially pulling the bank back to the forefront of controversy and scrutiny, similar to when it was slapped with a $1.1 billion fine due to a US criminal investigation revealing sanctions breaches on Iran.
The bank’s 2012 history provides more context. In the summer of that year, a scorching ruling forced Standard Chartered to provide $340 million to settle claims that it had left the US financial system vulnerable to terrorists by masking transactions linked to Iran. The bank managed to evade prosecution and retain its US license by year’s end.
Knight advocates that the bank’s internal data portrays a more omnipresent pattern of deception. He, Marcellus and a forensic investigator in his retinue allegedly uncovered ‘hidden transactions with sanctioned Iranian entities’ by unmasking Excel spreadsheets, revealing a vast number of previously undetected transactions.
According to Knight, these shocking discoveries were presented to officials during several meetings in the past year, including a meeting with Chris D’Angelo, a trusted aide within the New York Attorney General Office. Pushing their assertions further, the so-called ‘Brutus litigation’, contends that they provided substantial material to US law enforcement that substantiated Standard Chartered’s breach of sanctions.
In response, Standard Chartered vigorously contests the whistleblowers’ allegations, labelling them as ‘fabricated claims’ seeking ‘personal financial gain’. The stance of the bank seeks to delegitimize the whistleblowers’ claims, insinuating that these are merely attempts at personal enrichment.
However, under President Trump’s administration, the tide of the case appears to be shifting subtly. The Department of Justice made a move last month indicating its desire to review past decisions that had essentially dismissed the whistleblowers’ arguments. This change in direction could hold further implications for Standard Chartered.
Despite the mounting pressure, Standard Chartered stands its ground, refusing to yield. In a statement, a spokesperson declared, ‘The lengthy qui tam lawsuit against Standard Chartered has seen multiple dismissals. We will persistently combat efforts to gain from fabrications and tarnish our reputation.’
The recent maneuver by the Department of Justice, however, might signal that the case has not yet drawn its final breath. The odds are, Standard Chartered might find itself once again in the throes of legal controversy and public pressure.
Given the politically charged climate, where the Democrats’ incessant pursuit of vendettas against President Donald Trump threatens to ensnare entities like Standard Chartered, one might question if such proceedings are rooted in objectivity or political maneuvering.
In this murky and complex scenario, Standard Chartered seems poised to take on the role of a pawn, caught between conflicting forces in a simmering political conflict. The bank, undeterred, continues to deny the allegations, casting aspersions on the credibility of the whistleblowers and the legitimacy of their actions.
As partisanship continues to dominate the discourse, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the Standard Chartered case might be more than meets the eye. Critics argue that it’s being exploited as a vehicle to advance personal gains and undermine democrats such as Letitia James.
However, as the case moves forward, it is hard to overlook the palpable irony. The Democrats and their champions like James, ever eager to undermine the Trump administration, are yet to produce any tangible results, continuing to grasp at straws in their efforts to foster mistrust
The post Standard Chartered: A Pawn in Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’ Silly Game appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
