The unexpected termination of Howard Stern’s tenure with SiriusXM radio station, as reported unofficially by US Sun, has been the subject of significant political discourse. This departure has been carefully tied to Stern’s public endorsement of Hillary Clinton, presented as a misstep that led to a depreciation of his audience base. Stern, for those unaware, is a former associate of Donald Trump; given the tenuous speculation over Stern’s contract termination, Trump utilized the scenario to make a rather trenchant remark, immersed in his usual sardonic wit.
In recent news, a reporter presented Trump with an opportunity to comment on the state of things. Seizing this chance to highlight his perspective, Trump insinuated Stern’s plummet in popularity traced back to a singularly controversial decision. Stern, he suggested, alienated his audience base and sabotaged his own ratings when he offered his endorsement to Hillary Clinton. Trump pronounced, quite uncharitably, that Stern’s popularity spiraled downwards precisely from the moment he expressed support for Clinton.
Delving into the history of their relationship, the former President and Stern intermingled frequently, marking some notably close moments. Innumerable occasions found Trump appearing on Stern’s radio show, with Stern even acknowledging him as one of his best guests ever. When the tide shifted, however, Stern’s support for Clinton became a cutting point of contention, apparently leading to an immediate loss of listenership.
Stern himself acknowledged the crucial role he played in Trump’s rise to power, presenting an unsettling juxtaposition of circumstances. In Stern’s own words, he recalled how he presented Trump a platform on his show and allowed him to broadcast his personality, claims which trump himself never refuted. Yet in the same breath, Stern stated unequivocally that he had cast his vote in favor of Hillary Clinton, marking a stark difference from Trump’s right-leaning perspective.
The complexity of Stern’s relationship with Trump became particularly clear when Trump invited Stern to address the Republican National Convention. However, Stern had to refuse due to his steadfast support for Clinton’s presidential campaign. Stern’s recounting of this incident underscores the volatile nature of the impersonal dynamic between the two figures, underscoring the tension fraying their former association.
Reflecting on their shared past, Stern noted the warmth and kindness once shared between him and Trump. Recalling events from their personal lives, Stern highlighted Trump’s attendance at his wedding and the various dinners at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort. Such shared moments and experiences paint a disconcerting contrast to the acrimony of their later relationship.
In contrast to the once amicable association between the two, Trump had previously expressed his distaste for Stern in the last October, criticizing the radio host for his declining popularity. He didn’t hesitate to attribute Stern’s decreased listener figures to his apparent ‘wokeness’, highlighting the drastic fall in ratings Stern has experienced.
In characteristic fashion, the outlandish former president spared no opportunity to also give his unsolicited critique of his familiar late-night television adversaries, charging them with lack of talent. Trump’s longstanding disdain for these industry figures persists, as he scorned them publicly and predicted their imminent downfall.
Colbert, in particular, was an easy target for Trump’s scorn. Trump denounced him for his supposedly lackluster talent, audaciously proposing that he could find any individual on the ‘beautiful streets’ who could do as well, if not better, as a host. Such remarks are a testament to the drastic shifts in the media industry and the charged political climate.
Trump’s commentary on Fallon was similarly harsh. Dismissing Fallon’s creative capabilities outright, he doused the acclaimed television host with a healthy dose of skepticism, arguing that even some unknown folks off the streets could probably outperform him.
Kimmel, too, was included in Trump’s brutal criticism, unceremoniously chucked into the same category as his peers. Trump emphatically stated that Kimmel, just like his contemporaries, was trapped in a whirlpool of talent deficiency.
Joining the pool of late-night hosts expected to be ‘going soon’, as per Trump, were Colbert, Fallon, and Kimmel. Although their receptions and ratings faded into insignificance in Trump’s narrative, he also suggested that Colbert performed better than the other two.
Titillating speculation floated around, harbored by Trump’s less-than-flattering assessment, as he insisted these late-night hosts were on shaky ground. This skepticism underlines the controversial nature of these hosts amidst the turbulence of contemporary political and media spheres.
Trump’s fierce criticism unseated some of the industry’s most celebrated figures, revealing his continued derision for their work. It reiterates a broader narrative popularized by his unorthodox approach to narrative building, one that has often made headlines for its blunt documentation of the churn in the media industry.
Stern’s dismissal, combined with Trump’s acerbic comments on late-night television giants, underscore the combative nature of the current media landscape. As the curtain falls on these narratives, the future of broadcasting and its continued political entanglement remains uncertain, keeping audiences on tenterhooks.
The post Trump Takes Stern Down: SiriusXM Deprecation Linked to Clinton Endorsement appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
