The President of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, decisively commanded a halt to the country’s collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on July 3rd, following aerial bombardments carried out by the United States on significant Iranian nuclear locations amidst a heated aerial conflict led by Israel. Subsequent to this, it was made clear by Iran’s Foreign Affairs Ministry that the impending deliberations with the IAEA were going to be of a ‘technical’, exacting nature.
These discussions mark the first noteworthy interaction between Iran’s representatives and the nuclear overseer since Tehran officially severed ties with it in the previous month. The termination of relations stemmed from an intense Israeli-US coordinated air raid that lasted for a span of 12 days in June. This offensive resulted in substantial damage to numerous Iranian nuclear sites.
In the fallout from these events, the IAEA declared on June 12th that Iran had not adhered to its obligations regarding nuclear non-proliferation, a revelation made just a day prior to Israel launching air attacks on Iran. These strikes subsequently ignited the undeclared war.
The deputy head of the IAEA is scheduled to visit, yet no explicit announcement is currently available regarding the visit’s particulars or its nature of coverage, including whether it would entail a tour of the nuclear sites. This absence of clarity has raised numerous questions and led to speculations about the potential outcomes of the visit.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, disclosed to media representatives that a potential meeting with Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi might be on the cards. However, he stated that any speculation about the discussion’s outcomes would be premature, given the highly technical and intricate nature of the impending talks.
Baghaei expressed criticism toward the IAEA for its peculiar stance during the Israeli conflict in June. He expressed disapproval over the inaction of the agency, which refrained from issuing a prompt and judicious response when Iranian facilities, under 24-hour surveillance, were targeted, and subsequently did not deliver a necessary condemnation.
Earlier, Aragchi had stated that any cooperation with the IAEA would necessitate the approval of Iran’s paramount security organization, the Supreme National Security Council. This shift in approach seeks to redefine the interaction between IAEA and Iran. Such a decision could potentially tighten existing limitations on the inspection capabilities of official trackers, monitoring Tehran’s uranium enrichment program.
On July 3rd, responding to the aerial assaults on core Iranian nuclear sites led by Israel in alliance with the US, President Pezeshkian went ahead and commanded a cessation of all cooperation with the IAEA. The aerial combat claimed approximately 1,100 lives, including a significant number of military leaders.
In response to the strikes, Iran retaliated, resulting in 28 fatalities in Israel. The past has seen Iran restrict IAEA inspections as a strategy to apply pressure in negotiations with the Western Powers.
The unsettling endpoint of these conflicts leaves a cloud of uncertainty hovering over future dialogues between Tehran and Washington. These discussions primarily aim to reach a consensus regarding Iran’s nuclear program. As of now, there is no definite timeline as to when these negotiations will recommence.
The degree of uranium enrichment being undertaken by Iran has been a contentious issue. The latest findings suggest that it had been reaching as high as 60%, only a single crucial technical step away from the danger mark of 90%, which is the recognized threshold for weapons-grade enrichment.
Having said that, according to assessments by U.S. intelligence agencies, alongside the IAEA, Iran’s concentrated effort towards a structured nuclear weapon program had ceased to exist since 2003. However, the enrichment of uranium nearing weapons-grade levels adds a new layer of complication to the issue and raises concerns among the international community.
The situation has given rise to several points of friction between Israel, the US, Iran and other key members of the international community. The escalation of conflicts and the subsequent decision by President Pezeshkian to suspend cooperation with the IAEA have significantly affected diplomatic relationships.
Overall, it remains to be seen how the potentially charged and complex discussions between Iran and the IAEA will unfold in light of these recent occurrences and accumulated tensions. The international community awaits the results and consequences of these talks with a tense anticipation, hoping for a resolution that ensures peace and stability in the region.
The post Iran Halts Cooperation with the IAEA after US-Israeli Aerial Strikes appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
