Local activism bodies have begun to gather alongside roads leading to popular holiday destinations like Wrightsville Beach. Among these groups are the Immigrant Allies Forum, Indivisible Wilmington, and the Wilmington Chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America. They aim to encourage vacationers to consider the ethical impact of their travel choices by ‘flying their values’. This movement was initiated in response to a particular budget airline’s partnership with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
The protest’s targeted area was chosen to maximize visibility to numerous vacationers. The central focus is Avelo Airlines, which made headlines earlier this year due to their collaboration with ICE to aid in deportation flights. The campaigners argue that while Avelo offers relatively affordable tickets, the moral cost may be significantly higher, an aspect travelers should be aware of.
Avelo Airlines, a cost-effective carrier that covers 23 states, has been in the public eye for a while. Earlier this year, they launched a new operational base in Wilmington, which triggered a succession of protests throughout the city. Critics claim that local funds have been used to promote Avelo and attract tourists to Wilmington and other locales.
The wave of opposition first took form in May with a protest situated directly outside the local airport. As the weeks passed, the movement gained national momentum. Supporters argue that their goal is to enforce ‘commercial pressure’ on Avelo Airlines after their partnership agreement with ICE was publicized.
The campaign has since spread beyond Wilmington’s city limits, with similar protests breaking out in other parts of the country where Avelo holds significant influence. ‘Avelo Airlines is a commercial airline, unique in its contract with ICE to fly deportation flights from Arizona to El Salvador,’ explained one of the protestors. Their message to the public is simple: boycott Avelo.
The nationwide push to sway consumers away from Avelo is not without its challenges, given the multiplicity of opinions on immigration. However, local and national advocates label this as an ethical question, preferring travelers to switch their airline of choice if it indirectly supports what they consider an infringement on human rights.
And the efforts are not in vain, according to the protestors. ‘A few weeks back, Avelo had to cancel some flights and even reduced few travel routes, predominantly outside of Wilmington,’ one activist highlighted. This, in their minds, is evidence that their tactics are beginning to bear fruit.
The objective is clear: these localized efforts will bring about substantial changes within the region. However, Avelo, in its bid for financial solidity, justifies its choice to work with ICE. This rebuttal has further ignited the protest’s intensity.
One of the leading activists has made attempts to examine the specifics of the situation by requesting public records from the New Hanover County Airport Authority. After persistent efforts, he was informed that no budget allocation or revision was directed toward Avelo from the Airport Authority.
Along with this information, a standard copy of Avelo’s lease agreement, similar to the one that all airlines operating at ILM possess, was shared. A document outlining the airport authority’s incentive program, applicable to all airlines, was also forwarded to the activist.
Despite initial denials, the Deputy Airport Director admitted that there had been local funding channeled towards marketing Avelo flights and the ILM Airport since Avelo started operations. This revelation marked a crucial turning point in the campaign against Avelo.
From an economical perspective, Avelo has indeed contributed positively since its inception in Wilmington. However, protestors question whether these monetary benefits outweigh the moral implications. One activist drew attention to recent data showing that tourist spending in New Hanover County reached $1.1 billion in 2023.
It’s also worth mentioning that the county’s annual GDP in the last reported fiscal year was less than $20 billion. This leads skeptics to doubt the impact Avelo has had on the economy. They believe it’s unlikely that the budget carrier deserves credit for such a substantial fiscal advantage.
The economic boost, however, is being viewed with skepticism. The major ethical question protestors are highlighting is whether society is comfortable overlooking the airline’s involvement in controversial deportation flights simply because of their other, economically beneficial operations.
This predicament is, in essence, a question of morality versus profit. ‘Are we willing to compromise our ethical stances for economic benefits?’ seems to be the underlying debate fueling the campaign against Avelo, which continues with protests across the nation.
The post Protestors Campaign Against Avelo Airlines’ ICE Partnership appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
