On July 3, President Masoud Pezeshkian of Iran issued an order to halt the nation’s engagement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). This was in response to the United States’ attack on three significant Iranian nuclear facilities while Israel simultaneously engaged in aerial warfare with the Middle-East nation.
The dialogues with the Atomic Energy Agency are projected to be technical and complex, according to Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This would mark the inaugural visit of the nuclear regulatory body following Tehran’s termination of its connection with the institution. The disconnection occurred in the wake of an air-based conflict waged over twelve days by Israel and US against Iran, leading to the bombing of important nuclear facilities.
The IAEA board, a day prior to the initiation of Israeli airstrikes, announced that Iran had violated its obligations pertaining to nuclear non-proliferation. This announcement came before the outbreak of violent conflict between Israel and Iran. The International Atomic Energy Agency, however, refrained from releasing an immediate statement concerning the visit from the deputy head.
The deputy head of the organization did not include any scheduled visits to Iran’s nuclear facilities in his itinerary. The spokesperson for Iran’s Foreign Ministry, Esmail Baghaei, did not rule out the possibility of a meeting with the Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi, but stated that it was quite early to speculate on potential outcomes.
Baghaei went on to explain the complexity of the conversations, emphasizing that they were grounded in technical details. He was also critical of the IAEA during the warfare in June against Israel, describing it as an ‘unusual situation’.
The peaceful infrastructures of the nation which were under constant surveillance were subjected to continuous attacks. Baghaei voiced his disappointment at the agency for not expressing a judicious and rational response to these attacks, and not condemning them as necessary.
Aragchi had earlier posited that any further collaboration with the Atomic Energy Agency, which would now necessitate sanctioning from Iran’s topmost security entity – the Supreme National Security Council – would be focused on reworking cooperative terms between the two sides. This could potentially result in a reduction of the ability for inspectors to monitor Iran’s program closely, which till now, had been involved in the enrichment of uranium near the threshold of weaponry grade.
Subsequent to these events, on July 3, President Masoud Pezeshkian instructed that the nation’s cooperation with the IAEA be put on hold, following the raid of three prime Iranian nuclear centers by the United States. This occurred in tandem with Israel’s aerial assault on Iran, which lead to about 1,100 casualties, inclusive of several military leaders.
Retaliatory measures from Iran resulted in 28 deaths in Israel. In the past, the IAEA inspections have been only partially permitted by Iran, serving as a negotiation tactic with the west. Future dealings with the West and the precise timeline for resumption of these negotiations are presently uncertain.
The IAEA, along with US intelligence agencies have, based on their assessments, concluded that Iran last had an official nuclear weapons program in the year 2003. However, Iran had been strongly involved in the enrichment of uranium to an extent of 60% concentration, which is merely a short technological leap away from obtaining weapons-grade levels around 90%.
This potential for rapid progression towards achieving weapons-grade uranium levels raises notable concerns in the international community. The consequences of these recent disturbing events, have led to heightened tensions and ambiguity in discussions between Iran, the IAEA, and the West as a whole.
The recent spate of bombings and military confrontations with Israel have added yet another layer of complexity to the already intricate international relations in the Middle East. Iran’s recent divergence from the IAEA has not only ramped up concerns over the nation’s progress towards nuclear weaponry but has also thrown a significant wrench in the workings of global nuclear oversight.
Looking ahead, the evolving relationship between Iran and the IAEA might be indicative of a major change in the dynamics of the Middle East. The ability of the international community to regulate Iran’s nuclear activities will be vigorously tested in the coming days. The future of this entire situation is largely uncertain and the world can only watch as the events unfold.
At this critical juncture, the international community’s hope is for a peaceful resolution that protects both national interests and global security. It remains imperative, however, that the West, Iran, and the IAEA work together in order to foster mutual understanding, trust, and a comprehensive resolution that ensures peace and stability in a volatile region. The world will have to wait and see whether Iran’s recent actions will prompt a shift in the existing dynamics of international diplomacy.
The post Iran Halts Cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency in Threatening Move appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
