The looming Tuesday deadline for an extension on the provisional 90-day halt on imposing steeper tariffs on China remains foggy, generating unease in the global business sphere. After the latest China-U.S. trade negotiations last month, both Chinese and American representatives suggested the possibility for another three-month grace period. The ultimate decision rests with U.S. President Donald Trump, yet, no official declarative has emerged regarding his next course of action. The ambiguity has ensnared businesses in a state of apprehension, anxious that a surge in import duties might destabilize global markets, especially without any clue from either side about what Tuesday might bring.
Historically, President Trump has demonstrated variability in setting tariff deadlines and rates, adding to the prevailing uncertainty. The objective of the proposed elevated tariffs is to alleviate the extensive and persistent U.S. trade deficit with China, which plummeted to a 21-year nadir in July as China’s exports experienced the impact of impending tariff threats. Typically, it isn’t unusual for the American representatives to offer some insights about the ongoing negotiations, but the Chinese counterparts seldom make public declarations before the crucial decisions are reached. The Chinese authorities have opted for silence this time, as well, refraining from any comments ahead of the Tuesday deadline.
The Vice President of the U.S., JD Vance, in a recent interview, disclosed that President Trump was contemplating additional tariffs on China due to its oil acquisition from Russia. However, he added that President Trump was yet to make any definitive decisions. Sky-high tariffs on Chinese exports would significantly strain Beijing as it grapples with a recovering economy in the post-pandemic era. The Chinese economy, being the second-largest in the world, is still recuperating from an extended slump in its property market.
Furthermore, the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic has rendered millions of people dependent on temporary jobs, presenting challenges to its already burdened job market. The imposition of higher import tariffs on small packages originating from China has particularly hit the smaller-scale manufacturers, intensifying layoffs. Nevertheless, the U.S. greatly depends on China for a variety of imports, ranging from everyday goods, garments, and wind turbines to vital computer chips, electric vehicle batteries, and the rare earths needed to produce them.
This critical reliance hands Beijing a substantial bargaining chip in discussions with Washington. Despite the existing tariffs, China retains its competitive edge over a broad spectrum of products. The Chinese administration understands that the impact of increased tariff-induced prices on the U.S. economy is just beginning to transpire.
Presently, a 10% basic tariff applies to imports from China, coupled with an additional 20% duty concerning fentanyl issues. Certain products can incur even more disproportionate taxation. Meanwhile, exports from the U.S. are subject to an around 30% tariff imposed by China.
Before the temporary ceasefire, President Trump had warned about the imposition of gargantuan 245% import duties on Chinese goods. In response, China intimated its intention to raise the tariff on U.S. products to up to 125%. The unfolding of a trade war amidst the world’s two most powerful economies has implications that reverberate across the globe.
Impacts can be perceived on multiple dimensions: disruption of industrial supply chains, fluctuations in the demand for commodities like copper and oil, and even influencing geopolitical scenarios such as the conflict in Ukraine. Post a telephonic conversation with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, President Trump expressed his aspirations to reconvene with Xi within the year. This introduces a plausible stimulus for reaching an agreement with the Chinese administration.
Should the two economic giants fail to maintain their fragile truce, trade animosities might escalate, potentially leading to even steeper tariffs. This could further aggravate the strain on both economies and create global market ripples. In such testing times, businesses may hold back on making substantial investments and recruitment, causing an inflationary surge in turn.
The post Impending Tariff Hike Heightens Global Business Unrest appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
