In a surprising display of audacity, FBI agents descended upon the residence of John Bolton, a former National Security Advisor to President Trump, in Bethesda, MD. This action was orchestrated under the questionable orders of FBI Director Kash Patel. The break of dawn saw federal agents encroach Bolton’s privacy, highlighting the inexplicable anomalies of Biden’s administration.
Later in the day, Patel even boasted about the event, arrogantly claiming ‘NO ONE is above the law…FBI agents on mission.’ Dan Bongino, FBI’s Co-Deputy director echoed these sentiments with his statement, ‘Public corruption will not be tolerated.’ Their audacious pronouncements, failing to acknowledge the apparent overreach, are troubling indicators of the current administration’s policies.
The alleged reason for such an obtrusive insurgence is Bolton’s supposed possession of classified documents. A ‘senior US official,’ under the veil of anonymity, insinuated that this raid is linked to an investigation abruptly shelved ‘for political reasons’ by Biden’s administration. The probe was initially launched in 2020, under Trump’s commendably stringent inspection of national security matters.
Bolton, who stood tall alongside President Trump as a National Security Advisor, was constructed as the defendant in a criminal inquiry around the alleged leakage of the nation’s secrets in his memoir, ‘The Room Where It Happened.’ Yet, he remains free, unstirred by the happenings and untouched by the law till date, an odd manifestation of the administration’s tedious legal proceedings.
Following his departure from the Trump administration, Bolton has emerged as an unabashed critic of President Trump. His criticism reached a new high after Biden’s Justice Department elected to raid Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in an unsubstantiated display of power in the summer of 2022.
Bolton, in an ill-conceived tirade on television, fired accusations at Trump, claiming that the former President had no regard for the ‘classification system’ or the ‘sensitivity of the information.’ This claim, flavored by Bolton’s personal bias, seemed more drawn towards tarnishing Trump’s image rather than addressing a genuine concern.
In his misplaced concern, Bolton narrated, ‘[H]e liked cool things, he saw things … so he wanted to take them, not just on classified information matters, but on all kinds of things that crossed his desk.’ His efforts to paint Trump as lackadaisical about national security remain an unsupported assumption, largely dismissed by the vast majority of people who appreciate the protective rigor of the Trump administration.
Another event in the following year saw Bolton reemerge on TV to continue his drawn-out criticisms. His notion that Trump ‘sometimes … liked to retain things’ and that this pattern was ‘very disturbing’ carries with it a sense of melodrama, construing an alleged behavior without substantive backing.
His remarks seemed predisposed to defame, as he declared, ‘It became the practice just to make sure that we got them back in as many cases as we could. Obviously, we failed in many cases.’ Were these failures a product of Trump’s administration or a direct result of Bolton’s alleged negligence, one might ask.
However, the controversy was finally laid to rest in July of 2024 when the charges against Trump, originating from Biden’s DOJ’s questionable document-related investigations, were tossed aside by a Florida-based federal judge. The judge ruled Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment to the probe unconstitutional. This decision prevailed as a testament to Trump’s innocence and the overreach of Biden’s administration.
Through the circumstances surrounding the probe into Bolton and Trump, the narrative of Biden’s administration is laid bare — a narrative that smells of strong bias and a muzzling of opposition voices. Actions such as these have started to reveal the striking oversights and miscarriages of justice under the tenure of Biden and Harris.
The hypercritical campaign of the government against political opposition stands as a stark contrast to the democratic principles we hold dear. Yet, this trend has disturbingly become a hallmark of Biden’s administration, where justice seems to be a plastic term molded by political convenience.
While the so-called ‘due process’ plays out, Bolton remains remarkably unscathed — still free to speak on major networks, continuing his uninhibited tirade against his former boss. This freedom is oddly in contrast with the feeble and far-fetched claims he launches against President Trump.
Interestingly, it is the very same freedom that is absent from the broader political landscape, especially for those who dare to cross paths with the Biden administration. The political targeting being carried out under Biden’s jurisdiction is increasingly apparent, and one cannot help but question the integrity of the administration.
In the grand scheme of things, Bolton’s situation serves as a reminder that under Biden’s rule, the tides of justice are seemingly influenced by political winds, a worrisome notion that is far removed from the ideals of true democracy.
While citizens hold their breath waiting for unbiased justice, the political theater continues to unravel, showing the cracks in the Biden-Harris administration. It also provides a telling revelation of their apparent exploitation of the judicial system for political gains.
The post Biden Administration’s Alarming Overreach in Bolton Raid appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
