The Democratic Party has often used the phrase, ‘No one is above the law’ during their verbal confrontations with former President Donald Trump, noticeably during their two unsuccessful trials to impeach him. However, the same saying seems to be bouncing back at Democrats, given the increasing number of party members under the radar for numerous accusations, including mortgage fraud. On top of that, potential charges could spring from the Department of Justice’s probe into the ‘Russiagate’ conspiracy, a theory that the party zealously propagated for years without substantial evidence.
With the turn of events, the Institute for Justice is now persuading the U.S. Supreme Court to establish the principle of ‘No one is above the law’ as a nationwide precedent. The Institute argues, ‘Constitutional assurances lose their weight if the government can breach them without repercussions. From the birth of our nation, federal officials could be held accountable legally for infringing people’s rights. Under the current scenario, it is all the more essential that we uphold these sacred principles.’
Their initiative seeks to ensure access to legal redress whenever the rights of the citizens are violated by federal officials. Such forms of relief have been at the core of our nation’s original constitutional fabric, serving as a tool to enforce the protections under the Bill of Rights. However, over time, such basic guarantees of individual freedom are being challenged and eroded by the government.
The Institute insists, ‘A system of federal impunity should not be thrust upon the country by the judiciary capitulating to the government’s efforts. Throughout our history, the sanctions against federal officials who violated constitutional rights have acted as a deterrent. It is crucial that this tradition continues.’
The report published by the Institute highlights that the erstwhile structure of federal accountability in the United States has been significantly dismantled through a chain of legislations and court verdicts. Pertaining to this issue, the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) carries significance as it offers relief when government employees cause harm.
However, in the case presently at hand, the government exerts that the FTCA precludes remedies where a property owner from Texas alleges racial discrimination and economic disruption by the postal officials. The plaintiff alleges the officials refused mail delivery and tampered with her mailbox, causing distress to her and her tenants.
Echos of 1882 Supreme Court ruling reverberate in this case. Early precedent stated that if the ‘courts cannot provide a remedy’ for such damages, our government loses legitimacy in delivering ‘well-regulated liberty and the protection of personal rights.’ The Institute for Justice implores the Supreme Court to stand firm against government efforts to limit the scope of remedies in such circumstances.
The document produced by the Institute lists various egregiously unjust incidences involving federal officials. These narratives highlight situations where lower courts have denied compensation for blatant rights infringements. Among these, it references the gruesome assault of an unwitting Michigan student and the wrongful detainment of innocent teenage Somali refugees in Minnesota.
Another notable case mentioned involves a distressing early morning raid of an innocent family’s domicile in Georgia. The Institute for Justice, in this instance, successfully won a case in the Supreme Court regarding the FTCA’s applicability.
Given the present enforcement of federal police in various parts of the country, the Institute emphasizes the importance of the judiciary’s role in checking that the federal officials do not abuse their authority. They make the remarkable point that the FTCA ensures these checks and balances remain in place, thus safeguarding our individual liberties.
The post Institute for Justice Upholds ‘No One is Above the Law’, Trump Vindicated appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
