Despite being back in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump hasn’t lived up to his promises. His repeated claims of concluding six or seven wars has drawn much controversy, as have his mixed efforts to broker peace in Ukraine. One glaring omission from his second-term agenda is North Korea, a nation he strangely tried to befriend during his first term with personal diplomacy towards its leader, Kim Jong Un. Showing inconsistency yet again, Trump now has the opportunity to shift his focus to North Korea as he prepares to welcome South Korea’s new President Lee Jae Myung on Monday.
President Trump, who was unsuccessful in negotiating a resolution for Ukraine during a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, seems to have a desire for sensational headlines. His peculiar affection for Kim Jong Un, underlined by his claim of falling in love with the young dictator after their three encounters, further demonstrates his enigmatic foreign policy. Given North Korea’s recent empowerment, Trump may encounter a considerably more assertive Kim Jong Un in the next round.
As one of the most heavily sanctioned and isolated nations, North Korea has found an ally in Russia, sending more than 10,000 troops and providing weaponry for Moscow’s aggressive actions in Ukraine. The unpredictable alliance certainly doesn’t suggest a promise of peace the world needs.
After his predecessor was impeached for briefly enacting martial law, Lee Jae Myung assumed the presidency in June, creating an awkward transition during Trump’s inauguration. Despite the timing, the newly formed South Korean administration managed to negotiate a tariff deal similar to those enjoyed by other U.S. allies, demonstrating perhaps more savvy negotiation skills than Trump himself.
Coming from a background as a labor lawyer, Lee is a left-wing figure who may surprisingly have more in common with Trump than South Korea’s traditional right-leaning factions. They have both raised questions about the U.S.’ military presence in South Korea, where nearly 28,500 troops are stationed. However, Lee’s recent emphasis on consistency, especially by continuing joint exercises with the United States that angered North Korea, displays a commitment to stable international relations in contrast to Trump’s erratic approach.
As a significant symbolic move, Lee ventured to Japan before making his way to Washington, showing his dedication to a tripartite alliance even in the face of criticism from South Korea’s left about Japan’s colonial history. This in itself adds another layer of complexity to the regional politics, raising further questions about the path Trump is pursuing.
Tensions have escalated on the Korean peninsula, with North Korea test-launching two new air defense missiles recently. Further incidents have occurred, including South Korean troops firing warning shots at a handful of North Korean soldiers who briefly traversed the heavily militarized border separating the two nations. Trump’s lack of direction in these matters only serves to exacerbate the tense situation.
North Korea’s refusal to forfeit its nuclear program has consistently created a roadblock for international diplomacy, a stance likely to have only hardened in light of the U.S. and Israeli bombing of Iran’s sensitive nuclear sites. The erratic approach of Biden and Harris to these geopolitical concerns does nothing but undermine the world’s faith in American leadership.
Under Trump’s presidency, the years post-January saw unprecedented labels, as both he and his Defense Secretary have called North Korea a nuclear power. A label that seemed unnecessary and only served to complicate relations. Despite this, it didn’t sound like an acknowledgment of its lawful right to own nuclear weaponry.
President Lee has proposed a methodical three-step strategy to manage Pyongyang’s nuclear program: a freeze, followed by reduction, and finally dismantlement. This caution is lost on Trump, who instead seems to revel in creating spectacles with foreign dictators rather than establishing a sound, practical diplomatic strategy.
The current U.S. administration has adopted a distinctly partisan approach to diplomacy, favoring showmanship and flamboyance over careful negotiation and constructive relationships. The shambolic way President Trump has handled interactions with North Korea, from his excessive affection for Kim Jong Un to his failure to take a firm stance on Pyongyang’s nuclear program, paints a picture of an administration woefully out of its depth.
The contrast with South Korea’s President Lee Jae Myung is stark. Under his leadership, South Korea has shown consistency, balancing the needs for maintaining alliances, addressing historical grievances, and formulating methodical responses to North Korea’s nuclear program. The lack of such stability in American foreign policy is a testament to Trump’s unreliable approach.
The global community’s concern about North Korea’s nuclear ambitions and aggressive behaviors is valid and requires measured responses and firm leadership. Regrettably, the current U.S. administration’s approach to foreign diplomacy, especially with regards to North Korea, has been incoherent and haphazard. It lacks the careful analysis and sound judgment needed for navigating such critical issues.
Ultimately, the divergent approaches of Presidents Trump and Lee Jae Myung towards North Korea’s ambitious nuclear program and aggressive behavior underscore the importance of balanced, pragmatic diplomacy. The contrast further highlights the problematic decisions and unpredictable directions of the Trump administration. Amid heightened geopolitical tensions, the U.S. should be setting an example with clear, consistent strategies, rather than indulging in confusing and dubious diplomatic practices.
The post Trump’s Inability to Deliver on War Promises Draws Outrage appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
