It seems that the citizens of Washington DC will shoulder much of the financial burden. It’s hard to ignore the hefty cost associated with the aggressive National Guard occupation happening in a city enjoying a 30-year low in violent crimes. With an astonishingly high price tag exceeding $1 million daily, the financer of this authoritarian endeavor is none other than Donald Trump, who seems keen on making Washington DC his stronghold.
The task at hand involves over 2,100 National Guard personnel patrolling the streets with the objective to apply stringent federal charges on detained residents, enhancing the impact of Trump’s political agenda. It appears Trump intends to extend this operation beyond the initially proposed 30-day limit under the section of the Home Rule law, which was his initial rationale for the takeover; this implies these costs will keep mounting.
This massive expenditure has a recent justification. Trump’s newly issued executive order, dubbed as ‘Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful,’ entails broad scale personnel mobilizations and resource allocations across numerous federal departments.
Under this order, notable changes would be made at an array of government departments; from hiring new personnel for the Departments of Justice and Defense to beefing up security measures under the DC Transit Authority and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Additionally, the Department of Defense is set to administer the DC National Guard, while the US Park Police force will see increased numbers.
Adding to these measures, the executive order demands the creation of an ‘online portal’ for individuals pondering employment opportunities in law enforcement. This portal would host applications for a new ‘specialized unit’ dedicated to maintaining public safety and order in the nation’s capital. This unit could be deployed wherever necessary, including other cities adversely impacted by missing public safety and order.
This vast expansion considerably deviates from Trump’s original claim to combat an alleged crime wave caused by perceived Democratic inefficiency. It seems difficult to predict the enduring financial implications of this enormous security investment, due to its extensive dynamically growing governmental implications.
An analogous measure to consider would be the administration’s expensive and ineffective countermeasures enacted against the protests opposing its immigration enforcements in Los Angeles. That operation, characterized by the unnecessary flexing of military power, lasted for two months and led to financial losses amounting to $134 million.
By comparing this to the ongoing activities in Washington DC, the latter seems more expensive. Not only is it covering law enforcement, but it also encompasses city infrastructure enhancements. Despite being excessively authoritative and anti-democratic, the actions in LA appeared more targeted than those in Washington DC.
In further testament to Trump’s ambition is his request for an additional $2 billion from Congress to fund urban renovation projects alone, in a bid to transform Washington DC into the mold of his own preferences. There are also plans in place to facilitate notoriously expensive, high-profile events such as the 2026 World Cup draw in December.
Each of these extravagant efforts aimed at reconstructing Washington into Trump’s vision seems extreme and undemocratic. However, one particular incident stands out as particularly egregious. Senate Republicans, in the final stages of last spring’s government funding deal, utilized accounting maneuvers to withhold a significant $1 billion from the district’s budget.
This financial drain left the city in a desperate position, struggling to provide basic services and fiscal supports that contribute to overall public order. Despite the immense financial pressure imposed on the city, crime rates have yet to witness a noticeable spike, a testament to competent city governance, countering Trump’s false claims.
In other words, the city of Washington, already suffering from the financial fallout following the Trump administration’s excessive firing of federal workers, is now ironically financing its own daily suppression. The remainder of the nation is also set to experience a similar strain on their resources as the immense spending bill proposed by Trump is approved.
What’s unfolding could arguably be defined as an act of financial predation, stripping the district’s resources, ultimately putting the city under duress to manage basic service costs. The implications of such extensive spending are not merely confined to this city; they portend an uneasy future for economic stability nationwide.
In the final analysis, Washington DC is on the precipice of economic disturbance, fuelled by the financial burden being placed on its shoulders. The rest of the country isn’t immune either, as it too may encounter repercussions from Trump’s sizeable spending, leading to a nationwide economic echo.
The post Washington DC Shoulders High Financial Burden of National Guard Occupation appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
