It is a common occurrence, my inbox brimming with requests for dialogue, which, upon engagement, swiftly turn into confrontations. An ongoing narrative accuses me of embodying a genocidal Zionist, supposing I harbor a deep-seated desire to extirpate Palestinian offspring motivated by my mental instability and paranoia. Despite these allegations, it is I who sees hope in a brighter future where children of the Gaza Strip, West Bank, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran can thrive in liberated and affluent societies that coexist peacefully with Israel and the West.
In a conspicuous turn, the self-proclaimed peaceful voices endorsing the annihilation of a race, instigating violence, teaching propaganda to children, and lauding their gains publicly, appear as harmless as lambs. Worryingly, these ideas are gaining ground with the worldwide far-left, representing the ideologies I am strongly contending. As one observes the world, a broader concern emerges: how does one maintain their mental stability amid a sea of those who’ve seemingly lost the ability to reason—to put it more humorously, a planet filled with ‘zombies’?
This question doesn’t have an easy answer. The best solution I can fathom is what I have dubbed the ‘Weinberg Principle,’ named after a dear friend and former colleague at the University of Texas. It centers on the notion of potentially awakening these ideological ‘zombies’—with the hope that one can shake them from their mental slumber and stir reason within their minds.
Consider, for instance, the thought-provoking insight from Yoram Arnon in response to a question on Quora about the reasons behind the significant opposition to the idea of a ‘Free Palestine.’ Arnon contended that Western perception of freedom, inclusive of freedom of speech, expression, liberty of movement, religion, and political affiliation, is distinctly different from what is conveyed by the phrase ‘Free Palestine.’
This call to free Palestine essentially appeals for liberation from Jewish presence and the elimination of Israel, to replace it with an Arab state. Distinct from every other Middle Eastern nation, Israel embodies freedom as understood in the Western context. If Israel ceased to exist, Palestinians would likely find themselves under repressive rule, akin to most other Arab nations, bereft of the freedoms enumerated earlier.
Moreover, Israelis would likely confront grave consequences. Supporters of Palestine either fail to recognize this eventual consequence or actively seek it. Yet, thankfully, numerous Westerners comprehend this narrative, and these insightful individuals typically oppose the call for a ‘Free Palestine.’ For Palestinians to rise to the genuine freedom and well-being that the West wishes for them, they need first to acknowledge the legitimacy of Israel’s existence and choose to live peacefully alongside it.
Perhaps such articulation, along with similar discourse from Coleman Hughes, Douglas Murray, Hussein Aboubakr Mansour, Yassine Meskhout, John Aziz, Haviv Rettig Gur, Sam Harris, and the quantum computing pioneer David Deutsch, can spark a reboot in the minds of these metaphorical zombies.
Yet, even with these hopeful gestures, it seems that these intellectual resurrections would be few and far between. For every mind that regains its reason, a multitude of others will unflinchingly persist in their unreceptive paths. The larger the army of resistant thinkers grows, the lesser my inclination grows to join their ranks, and the more resolute I become in reassessing the grounds of the Zionist cause.
The post Confronting Misconceptions and Reimagining the Future of Zionism appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
