In recent times, increasingly more skeptics have begun to question the worth of a college degree. To some parents’ surprise, the expenses they bear for their children’s education often don’t match the perceived value. Take the case of the New School situated in Manhattan, a prominent private university that requires a tuition fee of $60,240; a figure that doesn’t even include accommodations.
At this institution exists an intriguing course under the domain of Eugene Lang College of Liberal Arts; a seminar quaintly dubbed ‘How to Steal.’ To clarify, the seminar doesn’t give classes on petty larceny, rather, it offers an inquisitive delve into the complex notions surrounding theft, private property, and public good.
This class encourages students to unravel the intricate politics intertwined within the act of theft. Further, the course is designed in a way that advances an understanding of the ethics involved in situations where privation is a customary occurrence and the world worships the accumulation of wealth and possessions.
A core element of the curriculum is the study of aesthetics in the realm of theft. This is done to highlight how in society, the demarcation line between private ownership and the collective good is often delineated in an intense and volatile manner. The ground reality isn’t always black-and-white; the distinction is often more blurred and contentious than it appears on the surface.
To provide a wholesome perspective, the academics of ‘How to Steal’ include field excursions. These trips are organized to locations representative of where money is stored in abundance and notions of value face continuous opposition— encompassing museums, banks, and even seemingly mundane places, like grocery stores.
Drawing parallels with the culture of New York City, where nonchalant attitudes towards small-time theft are prevalent, makes this course particularly fitting. The societal viewpoint here regards shoplifting merchandise valued less than $1,000 as insignificant, categorizing it as a simple misdemeanor.
A manifestation of this phenomenon is visible when locals witness someone exiting a CVS store with unpaid merchandise, an act which scarcely solicits any drastic reactions anymore. The city’s attitude towards such incidences has remarkably evolved into one of indifference, highlighting a broader societal shift in the perception of such acts.
The course description, presented unabashedly in the university’s catalog, emphasizes the exploration of ‘radical ethics’ within the class. This term is designed to encourage students to think beyond conventional constructs and challenge ingrained societal norms with more progressive interpretations.
Moreover, the study seeks to incite stimulating debate amongst students by posing the question: ‘Is it possible to steal back what was already stolen?’ This thought-provoking query implies a deep level of introspection about ownership, the act of larceny and the moral principles associated with them.
Furthermore, such discussions are intended to stimulate thinking about the relative conceptions of what is considered ‘right or wrong’ within the established confines of society. It suggests a broader examination of whether societal rules and constructs are genuinely fair and just, or inherently skewed in favor of certain privileged sections of the population.
Altogether, the implications of this class transcend beyond an academic course; it serves as a social mirror questioning the norms of accumulating wealth, societal inequality, and the decoding of the intricacies surrounding the ethics of theft.
In conclusion, while the value of higher education is a considerably debated topic, it is vital to keep in mind that the cost of education extends beyond mere monetary evaluations. The real essence of this lies in the breadth of knowledge gained, the stimulation of critical thinking, and the cultivation of an open-minded perspective. The ‘How to Steal’ course, as unconventional as it is, addresses these aspects effectively, thus presenting a new dimension to higher learning.
However, the unique and radical approach this course takes might come as a shock to some, especially those paying significant sums for their children’s education. Nevertheless, the brave attempt at encouraging students to question wealth accumulation, the ethics of theft, and the difference between public good and private property adds a unique spin to university education.
The New School’s bold offerings like these may challenge the conventional parameters of what constitutes ‘valuable’ education. By pushing for an exploration into unconventional themes such as the politics and ethics around theft, they are paving the way for more comprehensive, expansive, and thought-provoking education.
Ultimately, the discourse revolving around the true worth of a college degree will continue. Still, such innovative and progressive courses broaden the educational landscape and contribute towards a paradigm shift in academic horizons. They expand and stretch the conventional boundaries of knowledge, paving the way for holistic learning experiences that truly encapsulate the essence of further education.
The post New York University Offers Unique Course Titled ‘How to Steal’: A New Approach to Education appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
