There has been a profound restructuring of the civil service system under the Trump administration; a move that appears to simultaneously undercut the very institutions responsible for upholding federal employee ethics and preventing politicization within government departments. Evident in acts such as unreasonably amending technicalities which apply to federal employees, crafting new policies for layoffs, and even forming a new category of government employment that lets political nominees take on roles usually filled by career-based employees, the strategy is not subtle. Notably, the administration has introduced probes regarding political alignment to applicants for law enforcement and intelligence positions.
Symbolic of this attempt to reshape the civil service into a playground for party loyalists is Trump’s nomination of Paul Ingrassia, a 30-year-old with little professional experience, to lead the Office of Special Counsel (OSC). It could be argued that the goal of positioning Ingrassia in this critical role is to nullify the office for the president’s benefit or even manipulate it into a weapon against political enemies.
These maneuvers have raised considerable alarm, indicating potential political dominant control over civil service—denying benefits or services to non-party members and bolstering a form of ‘invisible policing’. This abuse of executive power leaves us questioning the existence of any safeguards or residual protection against these practices.
Under the Trump administration, the democratic institution has unfortunately been manipulated for personal gain and increased power, echoing actions of authoritarian leaders, such as Viktor Orbán in Hungary and Recep Erdo?an in Turkey. Misuse of government power for personal gain at public cost has no place in a liberal democracy.
Trumps actions strongly suggest that perceived opposition is punished through the deployment of state criminal law, while pardons are generously handed out to allies, supporters, and contributors. Art, architecture, and history have also fallen victim to this manipulation, and there have been instances of deploying the National Guard, Marines, and federal law enforcement agents to cities.
Originally, the US Office of Special Counsel was setup to be an independent institution and crucial safeguard against politicization within governmental functions. Disassembly or weakening these agencies make it exceedingly difficult to rebuild them to full capacity, making them subject to new protocols, operations, policies, chains of command, norms, regulations, alongside financial support from Congress.
The fallout from purging intelligence services of qualified personnel in favor of party loyalists could lead to great risks to our nation’s security. It is of utmost importance for us to remember the intended function of the Office of Government Ethics which is primarily to advise, report, and use any leverage it has for the betterment of governance.
In light of these disrupts, it is alarmingly evident that the integrity of democratic institutions is under a significant threat. We might see a future where institutions struggle under the weight of political influence, undermining the very ethics they were founded on. History warns against such a path, yet, the Trump-led restructuring appears to be unyielding.
To undermine an agency like the OSC especially is tantamount to opening the floodgates of partisan involvement in what should be neutral capacities. A poorly defended OSC might soon become manipulated to serve partisan agenda, causing more harm to the democracy.
It is also concerning to think about the potential injustices facing non-party members, who may find themselves unfairly denied benefits and services due to their political stance. This could be a potential misuse of political power, one that aims to suppress diversity and incite fear, which has significant implications for the future of American society.
The Trump administration’s influence on law enforcement and intelligence raises additional concerns about potential authoritarian tendencies. The insertion of biased loyalties in positions responsible for maintaining law and order is a dangerous game which undermines objectivity.
While it is troubling to see the pattern with which the Trump administration has been maneuvering, it is even more unsettling to see silence and inaction from institutions that should be stepping forward, reinforcing their role in a democratic society and offering a sense of security to the people against such exploitative practices.
Underlying all of this is the alarming risk to national security as intelligence agencies see a removal of experienced personnel and their replacement with partisan appointees. The ramifications of such action could place the nation at severe risk.
Let’s not forget the intended role of the Office of Government Ethics as an advisory and reporting body, which we need now more than ever. This office should be diligently working to counteract potential exploitation and misuse of power and influence, yet, it appears to struggle under the weight of increasing undue pressure.
To conclude, the current developments under the Trump administration need to be scrutinized with an objective lens. What we’re witnessing is a rapid political reinterpretation of roles and behaviors that were laid out to protect the independence and integrity of civil service, a dangerous precedent that, if not checked, could lead to profound, irreversible damage to democracy and societal norms.
The post Trump’s Power Play: Turning Government Agencies into Party Instruments? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
