The Los Angeles Police Department has made the decision to withdraw its personnel from the security role they were playing at the Brentwood, California residence of Kamala Harris, arousing stern and justified public disapproval. This disapproval stemmed from the concern for the noticeable numbers of police officers taken away from their primary duty of fighting crime to serve as custodians for the former vice president. An initial force of twelve officers from the Metro Division had been assigned to take up positions around Harris’s estate following President Trump’s discontinuation of her Secret Service Protection. However, this arrangement quickly ran its course and was disbanded by Saturday.
In a puzzling event earlier in the week, LAPD Metro Division members were observed loitering outside the ex-VP’s Brentwood dwelling, an event that concluded with the city opting to put an end to this off-kilter detail. Detrimentally, this initiative faced stringent criticism within the department itself, owing to the radical decision to remove LAPD officers from their San Fernando Valley anti-crime patrols for the sake of guarding Harris.
This reallocation of manpower was met with wide derision, particularly when it was noted that they were now tasked to guard a failed presidential candidate with sizable personal wealth who definitely has the means to hire private security. ‘It is somehow absurd that LAPD officers are drawn away from safeguarding everyday citizens, only to be reassigned to watch over an unsuccessful millionaire presidential contestant,’ the Los Angeles Police Protective League’s board lamented.
In an unusual directive, Mayor Karen Bass ordered the LA police force to collaborate with the California Highway Patrol following President Trump’s action, which she ridiculously labelled as an act of ‘political payback.’ Bass’s decision has been universally mocked and criticized, with the LAPD rank-and-file expressing deep disdain about the misutilized deployment.
The blows were dealt from both sides, as police officers were pulled from their duties in San Fernando Valley, where crime rates are soaring and the need for law enforcement is dire. Public complaints are on the rise, suggesting that securing a politician who failed the presidential race should never come before the safety of everyday citizens.
Throughout this debacle, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, whose approval was necessary for the California Highway Patrol’s involvement, hasn’t provided any form of confirmation regarding the plan. His office, however, released a vague statement saying that ‘the safety of our public officials should never be a target of erratic, vengeful political whims.’
Earlier in the week, a helicopter appeared to have spotted several LAPD officers fulfilling security duties at Harris’ residence. However, any city-funded security detail such as this was always going to be a stop-gap measure, given her intentions to seek out private security services.
In the grand scheme of things, service protection assigned to former vice presidents typically has a lifespan of a meager six months, coming nowhere near the lifetime protection that past presidents enjoy. Hence, this entire instance has unravelled into a maelstrom, mainly due to the question of who bears the cost of such protection, which is growing increasingly controversial.
As the controversy rages on over who foots the bill for protection, Harris is nonchalantly preparing for an extended 15-stop worldwide book tour to promote her autobiography titled ‘107 Days.’ This memoir recounts her short-lived, and quite forgettable, 2024 presidential campaign.
Traditionally, ex-vice presidents receive organization-provided protection for a mere half a year, a period which pales in comparison to the lifetime protection enjoyed by former presidents. This stark difference has been starkly highlighted in light of the present situation, which has cast a pall over the entire saga of providing taxpayer-funded security to the former vice president.
Despite these logistical concerns, the irony of this episode cannot be understated. One can only marvel at the audacity of pulling essential resources away from crime-ridden areas and tossing them at the feet of someone who was unable to secure a presidential election. Despite this glaring disparity, this is the unfortunate reality that Los Angeles residents and LAPD officers have been asked to tolerate.
In a city grappling with rising crime rates, the primary concern should be ensuring the safety of its citizens. However, this aim has been sadly eclipsed by the city’s bizarre decision to prioritize the safety of an unsuccessful presidential candidate with more than adequate personal resources.
It’s clear that the decision to reassign LAPD officers to provide security for Harris has been met with widespread pushback. The internal consternation within the LAPD and the broader community is reflective of the numerous ways that people feel Harris, despite her ostentatious wealth, should be responsible for her own safety.
Ultimately, this spectacle has brought to light a wider, systemic malady within American society where public resources, time, and energy are disproportionately channeled into capturing lightning in a bottle, a feat Harris unsuccessfully attempted in her 2024 presidential run. All this is done at the expense of those who need these resources the most, the regular inhabitants of this city, who now face compromised protection due to this bewildering decision.
This affair is by no means an isolated incident, but a telling reflection of how the powers-that-be tend to lose sight of their primary role as civic leaders. The real victims of this spiraling controversy, as always, are ordinary Angelenos who face the daily realities of a city marred by high crime rates.
In the grand scheme of things, the takeaway from this stumble should be the reminder that public officials serve the people, not the other way around. The duty of any public establishment, including the law enforcement agencies, should always be to prioritize the safety of ordinary citizens rather than focusing on individuals who, despite their failed political ambitions, have more than enough resources to protect themselves.
The post Harris Dodges Security Bill, Slammed for Misusing LAPD Officers appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
