A celebratory book marking Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday has unsettled a political career. The book revealed the close ties between Peter Mandelson, the ambassador to the United States from the United Kingdom, and Epstein, leading to his recall from duty. In the commemorative collection from 2003, Epstein was referred to by Mandelson as his ‘closest friend’. With Epstein characterised as ‘enigmatic’, Mandelson admitted he often hosting Epstein’s ‘exciting’ acquaintances alone, an admission accompanied by a photograph of an unidentified young female.
The U.K. government was forced to resign its U.S. ambassador for penning a note in the same book also believed to have been contributed to by the U.S. president. The departure of Mandelson delivers a blow to the preceding stability of the Labour-led U.K. government, which assumed power merely 12 months prior. Prime Minister Keir Starmer was the one who assigned Mandelson his diplomatic role and had originally stood by him in front of the Parliament.
PM Starmer corroborated that Mandelson’s affiliation with Epstein had been previously disclosed during the selection process, thereby asserting that he ‘trusts the ambassador in the duties he is performing.’ Stories pulled from old emails between Mandelson and Epstein were published by Bloomberg and the tabloid The Sun. The emails unveiled that Mandelson seemed unperturbed by Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor.
In the aftermath of Epstein’s sentencing, and procuring a generous plea bargain, an email sent by Mandelson expressed his sentiments saying, ‘You mean the world to me and I am bewildered and riled up about the events that have transpired,’ further adding, ‘I still can hardly comprehend it. It is something utterly unthinkable in Britain.’
There is no insinuation that Mandelson, openly gay, was linked with any of Epstein’s victims. However, the correspondence does hint that Mandelson offered to leverage his network to aid Epstein in repairing his reputation, a matter the Britsh government found excessive. In a statement, the Foreign Office posited, ‘The emails reveal that the depth and extent of Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein are divergent from what was understood at the time of his assignment.’
The Foreign Office’s perspective exemplifies the public consensus regarding Epstein: those who associated with him prior to his 2008 conviction could feasibly plead ignorance about his illicit interests in minors and evade damage. However, the ones who maintained their relationships with Epstein post-conviction faced significant reelings in their personal and professional lives. However, that particular perspective provides a convenient loophole. There are ample references hinting at ‘girls’ or Epstein’s ‘mysterious’ characteristics in the birthday book that suggest his friends should’ve scrutinized his activities, yet they largely exhibited a lack of curiosity.
The power of a president to dictate what is and isn’t actual isn’t recognized universally, hence Starmer couldn’t restrict the discussions around the scandal the same way. The timing of Mandelson’s departure could spell disaster for Starmer’s team, given that Starmer was in the midst of negotiating improved trade agreements for Britain and extended aid for Ukraine.
In his role as ambassador, the 71-year-old life peer, Mandelson, had made commendable strides. He boasted superb connections, rich political expertise, and took pride in his infamous ‘Prince of Darkness’ persona, aiding him to broker deals behind the scenes. His appointment last December, however, was seen as a gamble on Starmer’s part, who had released the reputable Karen Pierce to appoint Mandelson, a man with a controversial past.
Mandelson’s departure marks the second time Starmer’s governance has been rocked by scandal. Furthermore, Starmer’s government was already on shaky grounds, having announced its transition into ‘Phase Two’, an implicit admission of the failure of ‘Phase One’.
The belief among people that Starmer lacks the necessary political acuity to revitalize his government has deepened the difficulties faced by the prime minister. The humiliation of defending Mandelson in the House of Commons only to relieve him of his duties less than 24 hours later added to Starmer’s woes.
Nonetheless, the blame has been directed towards Starmer himself. His decision to appoint Mandelson was a risky move from the very beginning, and it’s a decision that has come back to haunt him. Starmer’s ordeal is a stark reminder that even in politics, ethical transgressions can exact a hefty price.
The post Political Fallout: Epstein’s Birthday Book Causes Diplomatic Scandal appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
