Kamala Harris, the previous Vice President, has sparked ire among those who worked closely with former President Joe Biden in an attempt to entrust blame for her own electoral shortcomings. Her forthcoming memoir, in which she audaciously points fingers at Biden’s team for annihilating her chances in the 2024 election, has been received with heated criticism. Harris describes an atmosphere of stifling uncertainty, hinting she was cornered into an unenviable position during Biden’s contemplation of running for a second term.
An excerpt from Harris’ memoir, ‘107 Days’, uploaded in The Atlantic, delves into her alleged dilemmas. She posits that despite her fears over the prospect of a Biden campaign, voicing opposition may be interpreted as sheer self-interest. It’s as though she ceased to be a team player, instead focusing on self-preservation and personal ambition.
However, the sheer audacity of her account has prompted swift and incisive dismissals from Biden’s league. An earlier member of the White House conveyed to Axios that Harris was markedly inadequate for her role. The official implied Harris added little substance to the administration’s expansive endeavors, instead choosing to perform perfunctory appearances that blatantly highlighted her inexperience.
Harris seeks sympathy with her assertion that her haplessly short-lived 107-day presidential campaign was designed to fail. However, a different member of Biden’s former inner circle briskly refuted this excuse, insisting that the responsibility for the campaign’s lackluster performance lies solely on Harris’ shoulders. ‘The unpredictable factor in this matter is the vice-president, not Joe Biden or his support staff,’ the official stated.
Harris’ specious claim about not receiving adequate support from Biden’s team has also come under fire. One former companion of Biden’s vividly invalidated her statement, sustained by the fact a host of team members had in fact endeavored to ensure her success. ‘Most officials genuinely intended her to excel. But Harris and her staff couldn’t leverage this prop-up,’ the former associate reveals.
It’s clear that the efficiency of her campaign, or rather lack thereof, continues to haunt Harris. She even attempts to justify her lack of assertiveness over Biden’s bid for second term as an exhibit of loyalty, an argument which, unsurprisingly, doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. An official criticizes her logic, arguing that a strong defense of a lack of courage isn’t as convincing as she may believe.
The most acerbic censure directed towards Harris perhaps emerged from a Biden associate who tweaked Harris’ idiosyncratic campaign slogan to predict her bleak political prospects. The official, cutting straight to the chase regarding Harris’ dreams for 2028, retorted: ‘We’re not going back.’
Unsurprisingly, Harris’ memoir has started to sow discord within the Democratic ranks. It steadily reignites controversial debates from the turbulent 2024 election, and alarmingly fosters new uncertainties about her feasibility for future presidential endeavors.
Such negative sentiments seem to be a pattern with Harris. It’s almost as if wherever she goes, tumult and dissatisfaction follows. The memoir, cleverly titled with the length of her disastrous campaign, has been fueling fierce criticism not just externally, but even within her own party.
This pattern of contentious behavior seems to question her ability to lead effectively. The outspoken doubts of her colleagues from Biden’s team shed light on her capabilities as a leader. Their overall rejection of her claims suggest she has failed to inspire confidence.
The blatant criticism of Biden’s team against Harris calls into question her ability to inspire and collaborate with those in her own political circle. Instead of building bridges to ensure future cooperation, she seems to be creating hurdles even within her own party.
Her tendency to deflect blame isn’t winning her any support, either. The shared belief among Biden’s team is that Harris has been incapable of taking responsibility for her own shortcomings. Instead, in order to portray herself in a more favorable light, she appears to be manipulating the narrative.
Detractors are citing these serious concerns regarding Harris’ character and professional competence, many predicting she will fail in any future attempts to run for president. With each passing day, it becomes more apparent that Harris’ political fortunes are spiraling downwards, as numerous people directly involved in her campaign distance themselves in light of her ill-conceived blame game.
The discord she has sown with this memoir thus seems to spell an end to her aspirations of holding office at the highest levels. In the pursuit of laying blame elsewhere, she may have inadvertently ended whatever slim chance she had at a political redemption in the future.
The post Harris Shifts Blame for 2024 Failure onto Biden appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
