President Donald Trump sounded the alarm Monday over an upcoming Supreme Court decision that could dismantle one of the cornerstones of his economic policy—reciprocal tariffs.
In a Truth Social post, Trump warned that the high court was presented with inaccurate financial data regarding the potential consequences of overturning his administration’s tariff policies. He cautioned that a ruling against the White House could trigger an “unwind” of investments, refunds, and economic structures that would exceed $3 trillion in damages. He described the possible fallout as an “insurmountable National Security Event” that could shake the U.S. economy to its core.
At the heart of the dispute is Trump’s sweeping use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs without direct congressional approval. The Supreme Court is set to hear Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., a case that consolidates multiple challenges to the 2025 “reciprocal tariffs” rolled out by the Trump administration. Those tariffs applied to dozens of trading partners and were a central pillar of Trump’s America First trade agenda.
Trump’s critics have argued that IEEPA was never intended to give the president such broad economic powers. Two lower courts—the Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—already ruled that Trump exceeded his authority, stating that tariff implementation without congressional sign-off violates statutory limits. If the Supreme Court upholds those rulings, it would force the government to issue massive refunds to companies that paid tariffs under the program and could render entire trade contracts unenforceable.
Trump is attempting to reframe the issue as not merely about trade, but about national survival. He contends that the tariffs are essential to bolstering U.S. manufacturing and safeguarding national security by reducing America’s reliance on adversarial supply chains. He emphasized that if the justices misjudge the scope of the risk, the country could face an economic calamity that reverberates for years.
His warning that the “wrong numbers” were given to the Court appears to be aimed at both shaping the public narrative and encouraging the justices to consider the broader implications of their ruling. According to Trump, undoing the tariffs would not only disrupt revenue streams but would also unravel the strategic reindustrialization policies put in place during his presidency.
The fiscal stakes are immense. Federal records show the government collected $213 billion in tariffs through September 2025 alone, with some months bringing in over $31 billion. Projections estimate around $3 trillion in revenue over the next decade, which the Congressional Budget Office says would reduce the national deficit by $2.8 trillion over ten years. However, that same CBO report acknowledges a potential 0.4% rise in inflation and a slight dip in GDP by 2027 due to tariff pressures.
Still, Trump and his economic advisors argue that the economic rebalancing has not hurt consumers as much as critics feared. A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis indicated that consumer prices have remained largely stable, as companies are waiting to see where tariffs land before adjusting pricing. Businesses are holding off on passing costs down to customers, especially with Trump pushing for long-term certainty in trade deals.
The stakes of the Court’s ruling go well beyond trade law. If the justices side with the administration, it would cement the president’s ability to act unilaterally on economic threats deemed national security concerns. If they rule against Trump, the economic and legal consequences would ripple across nearly every sector of the economy—setting a new precedent for how far executive power can stretch during times of declared emergencies.
Trump, who has repeatedly made tariffs a centerpiece of his 2024 and 2028 campaigns, is framing the case as a battle between patriotic sovereignty and globalist sabotage. As the Supreme Court prepares to weigh in, the future of U.S. trade—and the scope of presidential power—hangs in the balance.
The post Trump Sounds Alarm: SCOTUS Tariff Ruling Could Trigger $3 Trillion Economic ‘Unwind’ appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
