The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a historic case that could redefine the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, weighing in on President Donald Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants and certain foreign nationals.
Trump signed the order shortly after returning to office, aiming to block automatic citizenship for children born on U.S. soil to parents who are either in the country illegally or on temporary visas. The policy sparked an immediate wave of lawsuits, with critics arguing it violates the longstanding interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.
That clause has traditionally been understood to grant U.S. citizenship to anyone born on American soil, regardless of their parents’ status. Now, for the first time in over a century, the Supreme Court will formally reexamine that interpretation — with a final decision expected in June or July of next year.
Initial Legal Victory, But Unresolved Constitutional Question
Earlier this year, the justices ruled 6–3 to allow Trump’s order to be temporarily implemented in parts of the country while litigation proceeds. That ruling, split along ideological lines, marked a significant early victory for the administration but did not directly address the constitutionality of birthright citizenship itself.
Lower courts had previously issued injunctions blocking the order, but the Supreme Court’s intervention signaled a willingness to take up the deeper constitutional issue — one that has been debated for decades, particularly in conservative legal circles.
Trump Administration Argues 14th Amendment Is Misinterpreted
The Trump administration, backed by the Justice Department, contends that the 14th Amendment has been wrongly interpreted for years and was never intended to grant citizenship to the children of non-citizens or illegal entrants.
In its petition to the high court, the DOJ wrote:
“The lower court’s decisions invalidated a policy of prime importance to the President and his Administration in a manner that undermines our border security. Those decisions confer, without lawful justification, the privilege of American citizenship on hundreds of thousands of unqualified people.”
Constitutional originalists argue that the amendment’s “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” clause was meant to exclude individuals not fully subject to U.S. law — such as foreign diplomats, enemy occupiers, or illegal immigrants.
What’s at Stake
If the court sides with Trump, the decision could fundamentally alter how citizenship is determined in the United States. Critics warn that overturning birthright citizenship could create a class of stateless children and set off a wave of legal and bureaucratic uncertainty.
Supporters argue that the current policy incentivizes illegal immigration and contributes to so-called “birth tourism,” where foreign nationals enter the U.S. on temporary visas to give birth and secure citizenship for their child.
Ruling Expected Ahead of 2026 Midterms
The case is now positioned to become a major flashpoint in the national conversation on immigration, the Constitution, and presidential authority. With a ruling expected by early summer 2026, the outcome could have significant political implications ahead of the midterm elections.
For President Trump, it’s another example of using executive authority to challenge entrenched legal interpretations — and potentially reshape American law for decades to come.
The post Supreme Court to Rule on Trump’s Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
