Throughout the four-year tenure of the Biden-Harris command, it has been observed that about 10% of the overall U.S. populace comprises those who have entered and are staying in the country without legal authorization. These individuals have raised their voices, calling for the eradication of immigration regulations, advocating for unrestricted borders like those during the Biden-Harris era, and demanding immediate citizenship for anyone setting foot on U.S. soil. It’s crucial to remember that we’re speaking about the United States, not Mexico.
A segment of the Democratic party has been actively encouraging illegal migration, leading to increased friction. Controversially, Governor Newsom criticized former President Trump for his strict adherence to federal laws and his commitment to safeguarding Federal Buildings. This criticism labeled the former president as a dictator, stirring up a significant controversy.
Meanwhile, sporadic unrest is still witnessed in cities like Los Angeles. It raises a curious question about the specific demographic that possesses the luxury of time to cause disruption and block highways. Pursuing the path of criminal flight can lead to serious repercussions – punishments range from incarceration, fines, to the suspension of one’s driver’s license.
Despite their illegal status, certain unauthorized immigrants are unfairly reaping the benefits of Medicaid, EBT, SNAP, and school taxes – resources they technically should not be eligible for. This raises legitimate concerns about the allocation of these public resources and the impact on those genuinely deserving.
Looking back, it seems like another lifetime when media outlets promptly owned up to their reporting mistakes and issued corrections. Sadly, this practice is becoming increasingly rare. Take the instance of the Emergency Use Authorization for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. This quick authorization arguably overshadowed other treatments such as Ivermectin, touted by some as a ‘miracle drug’ that could have potentially saved many lives.
Critics argue that pharmaceutical corporations intentionally pushed these novel vaccines, despite knowing they may invite an array of adverse effects. The vital aspect of publicly acknowledging these adverse effects and retracting claims, if necessary, has been notably absent. Unfortunately, such acts of acknowledgement have become rare sights and unheard tunes in the healthcare industry.
It’s also worth mentioning how diesel fuel prices have notably decreased since the election of President Trump. Multiple everyday expenses have been on a declining trend in the recent quarter, bringing a sigh of relief for many. Denial of these facts could potentially stem from a lack of objectivity and personal bias.
The landscape of U.S. politics witnessed a significant shift when Donald Trump clinched a historic victory over Kamala Harris, pushing her to the sidelines. Not long after this defeat, Harris could be observed reverting to her previous stance of supporting those who disrupt peace while decrying the enforcement of law and order.
Drawing attention to California’s Democratic Governor, Gavin Newsom, he subtly dismissed the riots against ICE in Los Angeles. He equated these incidents to the celebratory sports riots that follow a Philadelphia Eagles’ triumph, downplaying the severity of the former event’s impact on public order and safety.
In another development, Vietnam gave the green light to a massive $1.5 billion project proposed by the Trump Organization and its local partners. The project encompasses the construction of golf courses, residential properties, and hotels. These decisions unfolded as Vietnam embarked on negotiations with the Trump administration, hoping to stave off a looming 46% tariff due to take hold in July.
Looking at these events, one can’t help but question the outcry around Hunter Biden, especially if viewed as dismissible by those comfortable with the aforementioned ‘grift’. People need to focus on facts and constructive discussions, rather than resorting to uninformed accusations and heated confrontations.
As California’s situation continues to evolve, it’s not the potential illegal decisions of the president that should worry us. Instead, we need to ponder what measures the American people might take in response. We were forewarned about the prospective strategies of this contentious regime.
Contradictions pepper political rhetoric; on one hand, Moderates claim that abolishing taxes on overtime pay would trigger businesses to halt time-and-a-half wage schemes. On the other, the Fair Labor Standards Act, which has mandated overtime pay for nearly nine decades, would seemingly contradict this.
The discourse and disputes surrounding these issues underline the need for objectiveness and factual accuracy in our politics. As citizens, our responsibility goes beyond engaging in heated debates—it encompasses making informed decisions, promoting transparency, and demanding accountability. Our actions today shape the nation’s future for generations to come.
The post Biden-Harris Era: A Closer Look at Immigration Policies appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
