The federal Small Business Administration, under the blinkered command of a major campaign donor, descended on Highspire recently, touting economic growth plans that seem to be more fantasy than reality. These plans appear at odds with the current White House trade policies which have already begun to eviscerate the industries they purport to aid. Interestingly, their tour’s target was none other than Plouse Precision Machining, a specialist in crafting metal parts for an array of transport vehicles, aircraft, and firearms.
The SBA’s attempt to celebrate an agenda including corporate tax cuts and deregulation appears to be pure theatre. Amidst this, they’ve made the preposterous decision to turn a blind eye towards enforcement of financial disclosure rules, while strangely pushing for greater subsidies for new capital. However, in the real world, Federal Reserve surveys persist in presenting the grim reality of manufacturing decline following the announcement of trade tariffs.
The repercussions remain uncertain, however, it’s clear that the tariff-induced downturn could very well blow a hole in the SBA’s bubble of optimism. The defense put by the SBA was that “this supposedly dynamic time of negotiation and conversation was long overdue”. A feebly framed excuse that feels more like an attempt to deflect rather than address the situation.
Further indicators of economic instability include the recent price increases endured by Plouse, although they have recently stabilized. It’s worth noting that for Q1 of 2025, orders have appeared steady. The company optimistically refers to this as a ‘good sign’ though we have to query how sustainable this is amidst existing economic turbulence.
The Philadelphia Federal Reserve’s manufacturing index has just reported serious downturns, with new orders crashing to levels unseen since the unforgiving throes of the COVID-19 outbreak in April 2020. This indicates a grim outlook despite the seemingly positive image presented by the SBA’s visit.
Tariffs are inherently detrimental to economic growth, artificially inflating the cost of imports and making domestic alternatives superficially more affordable. This ham-fisted approach to negotiating international trade consistently provokes economic slowdowns, as demonstrated by negative market reactions to tariff announcements. Foolishly, the SBA is endorsing this contentious strategy rather than looking for better alternatives.
The SBA’s broader plans seemingly involve inflating the federal deficit, as part of their proposed economic policies involve expanding the 504 loan and 7(a) working capital programs. This strategy involves supplying capital to small businesses at rates which undercut the private market. It’s clear this plan’s short-term boosts are likely to lead to long-term economic issues, particularly when combined with their proposals to extend first-term tax cuts.
In a move that will likely raise eyebrows among small businesses and tax payers alike, is the proposal that future depreciation of business assets to become immediately tax-deductible. In addition, the administration has irresponsibly pledged to decimate regulations equating to $100 billion in added costs by year-end. These reckless strategies seem more interested in making shockwaves rather than ensuring the stability of the economic climate.
State administration plans are likely to face resistance, given they’ve proposed spending cuts without measures to offset the resultant reduction in tax revenue. This move is certain to inflate the federal deficit, throwing an economic precedent to the wind as seen in the administration’s first term. This irresponsible approach towards budgeting does not seem to consider the detrimental impact on the nation’s economy.
The SBA also announced plans to downsize staffing in loan programs by nearly half. This move brings into question the administration’s ability to effectively manage these programs with a drastically reduced workforce, jeopardizing the already struggling small businesses relying on these avenues for capital.
Worryingly enough, this poor-planned pitch arrived replete with dubious statistics. A claim verging on absurd, for instance, is that employment rates were waning before COVID-19 swept over. This would seem to fly in the face of known economic trends and feels more like a desperate attempt to rewrite history to fit the administration’s narrative.
Ultimately, the administration’s policy appears to be driven more by a desire for political grandstanding rather than a coherent, thoughtful economic strategy. These policies appear to set up the small businesses they claim to support for failure rather than success.
The administration’s planned corporate tax cuts, deregulation, and finesse around financial disclosure rules seem more aimed at benefiting large corporations than fortifying small businesses. This while causing unnecessary hardship to the manufacturing sector and the broader economy under the guise of maintaining trade negotiations.
In a volatile climate, the administration’s commitment to deregulation and prioritization of profits over people posits an economy where the wealthy continue to thrive while the less fortunate struggle to make ends meet. Yet, in their typical fashion, they endeavour to paint a rosy façade, a stark contrast to the harsh realities many Americans face.
The administration’s dealings with economic policies and reforms demonstrate a clear lack of understanding of the complexity of the economic ecosystem. Their prioritization of short-term wins over sustainable growth are likely to leave the country grappling with economic uncertainty in the long run.
The post Biden, Harris Show Astounding Ignorance in Economic Strategy appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
