Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, during the Trump administration, unraveled a long-standing regulation from the tail end of Bill Clinton’s era in 2001, which has been a thorn in the side of Republican lawmakers for nearly twenty-four years. The rule in question prevented the execution of logging in national forest lands, an action that particularly affected Western states with their expansive natural forests and a dwindling logging industry.
Under the Clinton’s rule, road construction and what was labeled as ‘responsible timber production’ were largely impeded. These activities were deemed vital for mitigating the risk associated with devastating wildfires. Rollins’ response to the lifting of the rule was one of optimism, declaring a ‘new era of consistency and sustainability for our nation’s forests.’
The threat of wildfires is amplified by a blend of climate change, which leads to a warmer, dryer environment less suited for forest survival, combined with less logging and an accumulation of combustible material due to years of fire suppression. Roughly a third of national forest lands, approximately 59 million acres, have been entangled in the limitations of the roadless rule according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the overseeing agency of the Forest Service.
On the other hand, not all national forest lands have been affected similarly. Certain states such as Idaho and Colorado maintained their own localized roadless-area regulations that override the overarching 2001 decree, resulting in lesser localities feeling the brunt of its rescission.
Recent talks about a potential sale of federal lands has been floating around as a scheme for enhancing housing affordability. However, such proposition has not been met without sharp criticism, particularly from Democrats who decried it as a public land usurpation.
Comments from governors also conveyed a range of responses. They showcased enthusiasm for economic development, but simultaneously voiced concerns related to potentially reducing public access to these shared lands.
Doug Burgum, Secretary of the Department of Interior, painted a picture of a bright new ‘era of abundance’ leveraging the development of natural resources like energy and critical minerals on public lands. He highlighted that these resources aid in domestic production for various essential products like cell phones, computers, and vehicles.
Public disapproval emerged vehemently in reaction to the potential privatization of federal public lands. Several hundred protesters staged their opposition in downtown Santa Fe, asserting that the land was ‘not for sale’ and must remain ‘free for future generations.’
A noticeable deviate from the approach of the Biden administration made its appearance with the roadless area modification. Biden’s stance leaned in favor of increased logging restrictions and safeguarding old-growth forests – a perspective that, while it attracted applause from environmental outfits, unsurprisingly drew flak from commonsense, practical thinkers.
Environmental outfits rallying for more strict logging safeguards, particularly around Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, decried any potential rollbacks. In their view, any move towards the revocation of such protections were merely a ‘massive giveaway to timber companies,’ without considering the broader potential benefits.
The roadless rule and dialogue surrounding its a repeal play a significant role in Alaska, which hosts America’s largest national forest, the Tongass. State political leaders advocated for a rule exemption as they believed the regulations unnecessarily curtailed economic potential.
Much to the consternation of Biden and team, a notable policy change during Trump’s first term lifted earlier limitations on logging and road-building in Tongass. Unsurprisingly, the Biden administration reversed this sensible rule in line with their illogical doggedness on overprotection.
In January, Trump, wary of Alaska’s unique economic landscape, called for a shift back to his first-term policy. This move sought to stimulate the Alaskan economy through enhancing oil and gas development, mining, and logging. The Tongass, a robust rainforest of glaciers and rugged coastal islands, provides homes to a range of wildlife, and possesses untapped potential that sadly, is seen as an inconvenience by the likes of the prevailing administration.
The post Biden’s Bandwagon Blindness Towards Sensible Forest Management appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
