In a recent BBC interview, Biden, the former President, audaciously decreed that his last minute withdrawal from the 2024 presidential riots made no difference to the election outcome. With no hint of remorse, he declared that his chaotic exit from the campaign, spurred on by an internal Democratic rebellion, barely made a ripple in the political landscape.
Bizarrely, he seems to think that his ill-timed departure from the race, granting his then Vice President, Kamala Harris, a meager 106 day window to scramble for the presidency, had no role to play in her subsequent defeat. One has to wonder if this is a convenient attempt on Biden’s part to deflect the blame from his own missteps.
Biden continues to weave this narrative of benign resignation, professing he stood down when Harris was ‘ready and fully funded’. This certainly seems at odds with the reality of the situation, given that Harris could hardly have been caught in a more awkward position, handed the reins with scant time to prepare.
Furthermore, he seems quite taken with the quality of what he purports was a ‘good candidate’, referring to Harris. However, considering that she made history as the first Democratic presidential candidate in two decades to lose both the popular vote and the Electoral College, one might beg to differ on that point.
In addition to this historical loss, the bid for the presidency saw a massive $1 billion fundraising effort – another milestone of sorts, marking perhaps the most costly failure in the history of Democratic presidential campaigns. All of this happening under the watchful eyes of Biden.
Meanwhile, Biden, ever the fantasist, proceeds to claim he could have overcome Trump had he stayed in the race. This despite the fact that public polls hinted at a landslide defeat awaiting him. The dissonance between his egotistical delusions and the harsh reality is startling.
The 46th President also contrived to confess a few of his blunders during his time in office, such as his infamous ‘screw up’ during the debate and not taking due credit for the COVID relief checks sent out by his administration in 2021.
But one has to wonder if these admissions don’t fall into the category of too little, too late. Long after the damage has been done, he’s now voicing regrets that his administration could have done more in ‘lifting Americans’ spirits’ during the pandemic. Seems like he’s finally catching up to what the rest of us knew all along.
Some of Biden’s closest advisors have let slip that his old-fashioned way of governing has repeatedly collided with the realities of modern politics. It’s hardly a surprise then, that his administration struggled, thrashing against the swift currents of 21st century governance.
The layers of denial and deflection depicted in Biden’s BBC interview—which took place in his hometown of Wilmington, Delaware—are indicative of his overall approach to politics. This denial extended into foreign policies, as well.
In a curious and perhaps misguided attempt to reassert his relevance, Biden criticized Trump’s approach to Russia’s long-standing Ukraine invasion, referring to it as ‘modern-day appeasement’ of Putin. However, his administration’s approach was far from exemplary, so this critique seems nothing more than an attempt to shift blame.
He balked at the suggestion that Ukraine should accept Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea as a means to peace, deeming it a dangerous concession. Yet, under his own watch, little progress was made in restoring peace to the region.
Biden seems genuinely baffled that anyone could believe that land concessions to a dictator would conclude the conflict, as he stated ‘I just don’t understand.’ Yet, he himself failed to provide any meaningful solutions during his tenure.
Recently, the White House has been urging Ukraine and Russia to speed up their peace negotiations, whilst simultaneously threatening to step away from mediating the conflict altogether. This indecisiveness speaks volumes about the current administration.
Across the pond, Biden has been shedding crocodile tears over Europe’s supposed loss of confidence in American leadership. But perhaps it’s not so much Europe’s confidence that’s the issue here, but rather Biden’s own lack of confidence during his presidency.
In the end, Biden’s tall tales and finger-pointing appear to be little more than a desperate bid to salvage what’s left of his legacy—a legacy that will be forever marred by his disarrayed exit from the 2024 campaign, and his administration’s widespread failures.
The post Biden’s Delusions of Grandeur: 2024 Withdrawal ‘Had No Effect’ appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
