Over a decade and a half, individuals who have served their sentences have seen an apparent improvement in their healthcare coverage due to Medicaid expansion. The potential danger these improvements face now, under the shadow of Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act’ with its anticipated $1 trillion spending cuts, has been emphasized by critics. It has been suggested that the reduction in coverage may contribute to an increased mortality rate. The importance of Medicaid for post-incarceration individuals has been viewed as a key weapon in combatting the health issues that jail time often aggravates.
From studies carried out, we’ve seen statistical evidence that incarceration diminishes the life expectancy of a 45-year-old individual by 13%. Jails and prisons are frequently criticized for their often poor health conditions, including overcrowding and insufficient treatment for chronic diseases, mental health issues, and opiate addiction. Such factors typically result in the deterioration of an inmate’s health status that, worryingly, does not disappear upon release, adversely affecting their struggle for continuous healthcare outside prison.
However, it was under Obama’s reign that a key advance in access to care occurred; the 2010 Affordable Care Act which attempted to expand Medicaid. The U.S. Government Accountability Office applauded the act, acknowledging it had brought health insurance access to 80% to 90% of previously ineligible ex-inmates. Despite these advancements, the potential for fatal health issues remains, as highlighted by a study investigating inmate mortality rates in the Washington State Department of Corrections.
In data gathered between 1999 and 2003, the study found a disturbing 13 times higher death risk for released prisoners compared to average state citizens, primarily due to the risk of drug overdoses. This backdrop is especially concerning when we probe into the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’, which many speculate will increase the uninsured populace across the U.S. by over 10 million in the coming decade.
One of the most talked-about transformations under this new bill concerns Medicaid: impending work requirements which will be enacted by the end of December 2026 and are anticipated to introduce the largest cuts to the program. Critics warn that such conditional stipulations pose a significant burden to ex-convicts who already grapple with prejudice when seeking employment.
A noteworthy proportion of those formerly incarcerated are indeed employed, however, their work often falls short of the bill’s obligations. Hindered by obstacles such as racial discrimination and incomplete education—exacerbated by the criminal records the former prisoners carry—such individuals often find themselves employed in unregulated jobs, the so-called gray or black markets.
These positions are often unsteady, offering little to no assurances or provision of necessary references. Still, the bill allegedly attempts to soften the blow with certain carve-outs specifically designed to aid incarcerated people. For instance, after being discharged from prison, individuals will be exempted from the work requirement for three months.
Furthermore, the bill outlines exemptions from work requirements for those who can provide documentation of qualifying conditions such as substance use disorder or a developmental disability. However, cynics point out that these exemptions, similar to the work requirements, impose a strenuous task.
Exemption criteria necessitate a windfall of paperwork and occasional doctor consultations—during a time these individuals are already grappling with their health concerns. Certain policies seem designed to force states to abandon the individuals previously covered under the ACA Medicaid expansion, trading systemic improvements for bureaucratic obstacles.
Emanating from Georgia, we’ve seen signs of this already unfolding. In 2023, through a program named ‘Pathways’, the state imposed Medicaid work requirements. Celebrated as a novel approach to cover healthcare needs and motivate work, the program fell short of expectations with enrollment falling 75% below their initial projections.
The process, described as overly burdensome, was complicated by a shortage of support workers to help with the registration procedures. Critics argue that this will leave former prisoners particularly exposed to losing coverage due to the hassle of paperwork demanded by the work requirements.
Moreover, it appears that the states themselves will face hardships, even those willing to continue Medicaid under the ACA for the numerous ex-prisoners. Work requirements, in critics’ eyes, seem to be a guise for inflating red tape and exacerbating healthcare access challenges.
Observers worry that the stringent requirements could end up increasing custodial sentences and jail populations, which introduces its own set of costs. These voices warn that these new measures may shift public expenditure from healthcare towards reincarceration.
Quite the takeaway, it seems that more hurdles have been erected for those that have served their sentences under the guise of creating a better future. Interesting to see how this unfolds in the future.
The post Biden’s Ineffectiveness Highlights as Ex-Inmates’ Healthcare Hangs in Balance appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
