A stoic resident of Columbiana County, Don Vos, has stepped up to challenge what he perceives as a grave violation of the law in the approaching presidential election. He has taken it upon himself to contest the inclusion of Vice President Kamala Harris’ name on the ballot, following President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the candidacy last month. An ordinary man clad with self-acquired legal knowledge, Vos has lodged a federal lawsuit against Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, contending the action’s infringement on the constitution.
Joe Biden’s abrupt exit from the race has created an unconventional scenario, handing over the baton to Kamala Harris for the Democratic party. However, critics like Vos interpret Biden’s move as a wily tactic to circumvent the democratic process, thereby mocking the tenets of democracy itself. According to Vos, this unjust move violates the Ohio state constitution’s Article 1, Section 20, that prioritizes people’s rights, leading to his objection.
Vos, a septuagenarian, asserts that this law – prohibiting the installation of a Vice President in place of a resigning Democratic Party candidate this close to the presidential election – is not explicitly endowed to the secretary of state. His argument stands on the fervent belief that if the constitution doesn’t state it explicitly, it’s prohibited, stoking the need for a challenge. And he believes himself to be the person to shoulder that fight for justice.
Vos formalized his passionate plea for justice by registering a complaint on the first day of August in the U.S. District Court. In this battle against the unjust switch, Judge Dan Aaron Polster from Cleveland has been brought on board to preside over the case.
The Secretary of State’s Office, however, did not remain silent in the face of this looming legal battle. Dan Lusheck, who acts as a media bridge for Secretary of State Frank LaRose, proceeded to clarify that as per Ohioan law, both primary parties retain the authority to nominate any candidate in line with their party rules, so long as the Secretary of State is informed before September 1st.
Underlining this argument, Ohio House Bill 2 holds that a nominee must be decided upon prior to the election by 65 days. The upcoming election, which is just over two months away, falls within this stipulated timeline. Lusheck mentioned his obliviousness to any comparable litigations gaining momentum in the Ohio courts at this time.
In redirecting the focus of the legal discourse, Vos states that he recognizes only two viable candidates for the forthcoming ballot – former President Donald Trump and independent contender Robert F. Kennedy Jr. While he adamantly supports Trump, he fantasizes about a political fusion in which Trump coheres with Kennedy on a joint ticket.
Vos’ dedication to the law, accrued over his three decades leading a civil militia, informs his staunch disrespect for the erratic change in Democratic leadership. His belief in the universality and absoluteness of the law and its equal application to all has been a driving force behind his decision to legally challenge this unprecedented move.
Drawing on this commitment to fair play, Vos reveals his intent to initiate similar challenges in Virginia, New York, and Pennsylvania. His driving force is the pursuit of a constitutional resolution to the question raised by this sudden change in the Democratic nominee this close to the election.
Vos even extends his conviction to hypothetical circumstances involving the Republican Party. He declares that were the Republican Party to make such a swift candidate swap as the Democrats have done, he would not hesitate to question its lawfulness. This assertion showcases Vos’ unwavering commitment to fair electoral practices and his resistance against any constitutional mockery.
Biden’s Unprincipled Withdrawal Sparks Outrage among Devoted Citizens appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
