It’s hard to not notice the haphazard approach Donald Trump took to the global economic sector, pushing for additional tariffs just after an already dissatisfying jobs report. This move, once more, put unnecessary pressure on consumers through inflated prices, leaving markets in a state of significant uncertainty. Interestingly, he chose to do so after weeks of what appeared to be trade talks, echoing his typical anti-trade modus operandi. If you were wondering about the legality of such actions, scholars view Trump’s actions as not only disorderly and damaging, but also in violation of the legal constraints that are in place.
These tariff decisions were not grounded in any long-term strategizing or economic evaluation, but instead, arised out of Trump’s misinterpretation of a 1977 statute designed to handle precise financial actions during specific crises. With his hasty actions, he unwittingly involved the United States in a broader, uncontrolled trade alteration with other nations. A day prior to the announcement of the latest tariffs, a collective of the nation’s top legal minds on the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington raised their eyebrows at the notion.
They highlighted how such a statute, originally framed to address emergency fiscal matters, does not even make mention of imposing tariffs. This anomaly made it crystal clear that Trump’s bullying tactic was not only baseless but an unpresidented misuse of this law. As the plaintiffs, they sought legal arguments against this illegal imposition, and they didn’t need to look further than Trump’s own social media outbursts and rambling speeches.
In numerous instances, Trump openly admitted through his posts and public interviews, his reasons for engaging in unethical tariffs bore no relation to plausible economic pursuits. Astonishingly, he went as far as threatening tariffs over Brazil’s internal political issues and Canada’s handling of diplomatic relationships with Palestine. Though an array of unrelated issues triggered these threats, the shared thread was Trump’s ideological inspiration, likely inspired by some television program he watched, clearly detached from solving trade deficits.
Unfortunately for Trump, the U.S. Court of International Trade – an entity expressly established to interpret these nuanced matters – largely invalidated his tariff impositions. They cited that Trump’s tariff policies were unlawful and exceeded his given authority. While the ruling has been temporarily suspended, the evidence against these actions continues to accumulate, further indicating Trump’s blatant disregard for his authority.
As this craziness persists, we are now seeing the negative consequences of Trump’s questionable policies. His reckless approach has left an indelible mark on trade and diplomatic relations, causing irreparable harm to the U.S. and its allies. The international community, tired of waiting for the U.S. to sort out the chaos, is bypassing the historically trustworthy nation and moving on to establish their trade alliances elsewhere.
With the severity of the allegations and the potential for long-term negative repercussions, it’s only a matter of time before this hot website topic lands in the hallowed halls of the U.S. Supreme Court— that’s where unprecedented issues of this magnitude typically find resolution. However, recent trends on the Supreme Court seem to highlight a predilection for ideological conclusions over the rigorous application of the law. Still, it’s unfathomable that the high court would side with Trump on such glaring legal missteps.
It’s disconcerting to think that the same Supreme Court recently ruled Joe Biden’s emergency powers—invoked to ease student debt in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic—as unlawful. Given Biden’s actions were in response to a genuine global crisis that claimed countless lives and wrecked economies globally, critical assessment of Trump’s rash tariffs seems inescapable. It exposes a glaring inconsistency if Biden trying to alleviate financial burdens in an actual crisis is deemed unlawful but Trump, changing trade rules on a whim to satisfy worldly grievances, is considered within his rights.
The contradiction is not only alarming but threatens to throw the rule of law into disarray. Trump’s impulsive tariff policies are bound to leave an indelible stain on the economy. If his whims supersede law, chaos can be the only result. We must put an end to this madness promptly before economic forces reel out of control and run rough-shod over the average citizen.
The post Blatant Disregard: Trump’s Unlawful Trade Policies Expose His Fickle Nature appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
