During an exchange, Brian Moynihan, the CEO of Bank of America, made suggestions towards a fundamental reason behind the termination of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner by the president, following a dismal jobs report. Moynihan hinted at political motivations, even while touching on the idea of enhancing the standards of government labor information. Yet, when asked about any political pressure he potentially felt, coupled with his thoughts regarding the abrupt firing, his response was reflective of sheer political gamesmanship.
Giving his insights, Moynihan pointed towards the outdated and increasingly ineffective data collection processes that the agency uses. In recent years, a decline in responses to the agency’s data collection efforts has been noticed. This has led to revised versions of the monthly jobs report being issued. Such revisions raise questions about the reliability of the data being presented, causing concerns about the effectiveness of the agency’s methods.
Moynihan laid out the facts frankly, expressing concern over the questionable reliability of antiquated survey methods showing response rates plummeting – ‘…it’s down from a 60% level to a 50% level’. In a startling contrast, he highlighted that Bank of America employs a more practical and effective approach to assessing labor market data, principally focusing on real-time insights into business and consumer activities.
Reflecting on the Bank of America’s strategy, Moynihan said, ‘We watch what consumers do. We watch what businesses do.’ His remarks underscored his belief that the BLS could greatly improve its data accuracy by utilizing a similar data-driven approach, rather than relying completely on surveys, for better representation of the labor market conditions.
The BLS released its July jobs report, revealing disappointing numbers. The report showcased that only 73,000 jobs were added to the US economy last month – a number far below the 110,000 jobs predicted by economists. Adding to the concerns over the reliability of their methods, the agency also brought forth what they referred to as a ‘larger than normal’ downward adjustment to job gains for the preceding two months.
The substandard number of jobs added in May and June — previously reported as being 144,000 and 147,000 respectively — were dramatically revised downwards. May’s 144,000 jobs were drastically reduced to a mere 19,000 jobs, following a downward revision of 125,000. While, June’s job gains were also remarkably tapered down by 133,000 to a scant 14,000, further evidencing the erroneous estimations published initially by the agency.
It was following the release of this report that ex-President Donald Trump publicly announced his decision to relieve BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer of her duties. The ex-President accused her of maliciously skewing the jobs figures, making allegations of political manipulation. It was evident at this point, that the scrutinized July report was positioned as a scapegoat to serve political machinations.
Trump took to his platform to spew further allegations of data manipulation on part of the BLS. Drawing from past instances of overstatements, he forcefully argued, ‘This is the same Bureau of Labor Statistics that exaggerated the Jobs Growth in March 2024 by about 818,000, followed by a repeat performance just before the 2024 Presidential Election in August and September, by 112,000.’ He insinuated that such discrepancies were too vast to be mere accidents.
Fueling his rhetoric, Trump insisted on the necessity of accurate jobs figures. The ex-President demanded instant dismissal of the commissioner, vowing to replace her with a more competent appointment. Trump asserted, ‘Critical data like this must be impartial and precise; it isn’t a playing field for political manipulations.’ In making this assertion, Trump bared his intention to put forward a nomination for a new BLS commissioner.
Trump’s allegations continued unabated as he sustained the narrative of manipulated numbers, weaving a tale of a rigged jobs report. He insinuated, ‘Last week’s Job’s Report was RIGGED, much like the numbers preceding the Presidential Election were Rigged.’ His relentless accusations pointed towards a perceived favoritism towards ‘Radical Left Democrats’ while promising an exceptional replacement for the BLS commissioner post.
Perhaps in a different political climate, these allegations might warrant serious consideration. However, under a president who regularly employed a strategy of misinformation to deflect from his many failures, such cries of ‘rigged’ results resemble an all too familiar pattern, an excuse for shortcomings. While new leadership at BLS could theoretically offer a fresh perspective, it remains to be seen how much of this is mere political posturing and how much could lead to substantive improvements in national labor statistics.
Even though these alterations could potentially influence the labor market data, and in turn, the overall understanding of the nation’s economy, it’s crucial to evaluate the validity of these accusations objectively. Being too quick to accept them might unconsciously perpetuate an act of defamation that, despite possibly resonating with a certain demographic, creates division and mistrust.
On a concluding note, it’s worth noting that although changes may be necessary to improve data accuracy in labor market reporting, accusations without evidence and the constant cries of ‘rigged’ and ‘fake’ only serve to undermine trust in these institutions. The U.S. economy and the people deserve transparent, unbiased data to better understand their economic environment. Politicized changes based on unfounded allegations might serve a short-term political agenda, but they bear the risk of long-term damage to the country’s social fabric.
The post Bureau of Labor Statistics in Hot Water: Massive Job Report Error or Deliberate Manipulation? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
