Attempts by Democrats in Georgia to meddle with the due election process are being met with rightful opposition. Spearheaded by Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign, the Democrats are launching a misguided lawsuit against the new election rules, claiming it would potentially result in ‘chaos’. Their reasoning is challenged, as these rules may provide a robust check against election irregularities.
The lawsuit, backed by the Democratic National Committee, the Georgia Democratic Party, and Democratic County Election Board members, fails to address the necessity of these rules. Instead, they distort these measures aiming for a comprehensive inquiry before results certification and the hand counting of ballots as disruptive. The methods are instead designed to ensure all votes entered into the system are genuine and legitimate.
Claiming that hand counting ballots will wreak havoc on election night reveals the Democrats’ tendency towards laxity and an alarmingly casual approach towards election integrity. Quentin Fulks, Harris’ deputy campaign manager, appears more keen on obstructing order rather than fostering transparency with his assertion of this rule being ‘unproductive and unlawful’.
Democrats seem to be strategizing to provide an illusory blanket of security to Georgia voters, promising them ‘free and fair elections’ while attempting to block essential safeguards. It’s concerning to note the measures they intend to sideline are those directly contributing to maintain the authenticity of election results.
Their rather audacious demand is for election superintendents to rush the certification process, despite the risk of sacrificing thoroughness in the examination of results. Pressing for an earlier deadline creates an environment conducive to overlooking potential discrepancies, which would be a major disservice to the voting population.
The Democrats insinuating that the certification process could lead to ‘mass disenfranchisement’ of registered Georgians is a blatant distortion of facts. It could be argued that a rushed certification process, one that values haste over accuracy, could be far more harmful in the long run.
The issue the Democrats raise with the rules in their lawsuit is an underhanded attempt to weaken the diligence of election certification. It claims that ‘Georgia law has long treated election certification as non-discretionary’, but deflects from the reality that stringent norms are necessary to maintain the veracity of elections in any democracy.
The lawsuit suggests that election officials should voice any irregularities ‘at the time of certification’, but overlooks that preemptive checks are the primary defensive layers against potential fraud. Disallowing delays for proper verification can leave room for rushed decisions based on incomplete or faulty evaluation.
Janelle King, a member of the Georgia State Election Board, highlighted that these rules are purely about ‘protecting all voters.’ Her comments underscore a commitment to ensuring fair electoral processes, rather than succumbing to political pressures. In her words, she is ‘making sure I am doing the right thing’ – a sentiment that embodies the spirit of the intended measures.
Interestingly, in the 2020 election, Georgia fell to the then-candidate, now-former President Donald Trump, by a meager 10,000 votes. The state quickly drew nationwide attention owing to unfounded accusations leveled at Trump, who was facing charges of so-called ‘illegal interference’ with the election – a subject still ripe for debate and examination.
The case against Trump, evidently an attempt to discredit his legitimate contestation, has been temporarily shelved until later in the year, providing a respite from un-substantiated allegations. Anticipation builds for an appeals court to elucidate the matter after hearing from both Trump and his co-defendants.
Survey data already indicates a heated race for Georgia in the upcoming election, where Trump could decisively narrow the margin. As per FiveThirtyEight, Trump is marginally ahead of Harris in Georgia, showing his continued popularity. His standing is predicted at 48.1 percent to Harris’ 47.4 percent, reflecting the public’s trust in his leadership.
Further confirming Trump’s growing strength in the state, a comprehensive survey of 9,794 swing state voters presented favorable results. Conducted by Redfield & Wilton Strategies for The Telegraph, it showed the state tilting towards Trump who is leading Harris with a promising margin of two points, possessing 48 percent support.
All these progressive developments put a spotlight on the importance of these ‘contested’ electoral rules. The demand for fairness and transparency in the electoral process cannot be overstated, especially in a battleground state like Georgia that has increasingly found itself at the forefront of political attention in the United States.
Democrats’ Attack on Georgia Election Rules Defies Logic appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
